Timeline for Difference between monopole moment and charge or mass itself?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Sep 23, 2023 at 7:52 | history | suggested | Takina | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed spelling and grammar
|
| Sep 23, 2023 at 3:49 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Sep 23, 2023 at 7:52 | |||||
| Feb 3, 2020 at 14:55 | comment | added | Richter65 | The multipole expansion applies to a $1/r$ potential with a finite density localized to a particular region, and it's only valid outside that region. So you can't do the expansion at a reference point inside the object. | |
| Jan 27, 2020 at 22:45 | answer | added | Richter65 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 31, 2019 at 11:18 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Jul 31, 2019 at 10:36 | comment | added | Hartmut Braun | If you only consider monopole then the field is not related to the shape, because different sized earths (different shape) of same mass result in the same field. Only when you take the field inside the object into account, you will have a relation to the shape. But then it‘s not a monopole anymore... hmmm.... nice question! | |
| Jul 31, 2019 at 10:19 | history | edited | Schok |
edited tags
|
|
| Jul 31, 2019 at 9:59 | history | asked | Schok | CC BY-SA 4.0 |