Timeline for $CP$ Invariance of Yang-Mills Vacua in Electroweak Theory
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 28, 2019 at 3:58 | comment | added | Optimus Prime | In any case, the question remains: will or will not the neighboring (classical) $n=1$ vacuum be CP invariant? | |
Jul 28, 2019 at 2:56 | comment | added | octonion | Okay, but keep in mind that the rotating away of the theta angle term when you have a massless fermion is a purely quantum effect. | |
Jul 28, 2019 at 1:05 | comment | added | Optimus Prime | @octonion, I'm asking about the infinitely degenerate classical vacua (the minima of the periodic potential). Perhaps I caused unwanted complication by bringing up theta and should have stuck with a shift symmetry of sorts | |
Jul 27, 2019 at 18:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/1155176041079562240 | ||
Jul 26, 2019 at 19:47 | comment | added | octonion | Are you asking a question about purely classical configurations? What you refer to as vacua in your question (the states with a definite topological charge) are field configurations. But as John Dougherty's points out in his answer the quantum states are a superposition of states connected by large gauge transformations. | |
Jul 26, 2019 at 3:43 | history | edited | Optimus Prime | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 83 characters in body
|
Jul 25, 2019 at 3:03 | history | edited | Optimus Prime |
edited tags
|
|
Jul 24, 2019 at 12:35 | history | edited | Optimus Prime | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 186 characters in body
|
Jul 24, 2019 at 10:21 | answer | added | John Dougherty | timeline score: 2 | |
Jul 24, 2019 at 8:03 | history | asked | Optimus Prime | CC BY-SA 4.0 |