Timeline for Waves in Box are Black Bodies?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2021 at 14:25 | vote | accept | Kouta Dagnino | ||
| Dec 21, 2019 at 10:30 | vote | accept | Kouta Dagnino | ||
| Aug 14, 2021 at 14:23 | |||||
| Jul 14, 2019 at 14:26 | history | edited | GiorgioP-DoomsdayClockIsAt-90 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
corrected a grammar mistake
|
| Jul 14, 2019 at 14:00 | comment | added | Kouta Dagnino | Thank you, clarified a lot. | |
| Jul 14, 2019 at 8:41 | history | edited | GiorgioP-DoomsdayClockIsAt-90 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added a second part on the approximations used to model em waves in the cavity
|
| Jul 14, 2019 at 8:20 | comment | added | GiorgioP-DoomsdayClockIsAt-90 | @KoutaDagnino I'll add something on this issue to my answer to clarify this point. | |
| Jul 13, 2019 at 18:13 | comment | added | Kouta Dagnino | Thank yous o much. So when deriving the Planck equation the simplest model is considering stationary waves inside a box, if I understood correctly. If so, then they have zero amplitude at the walls, right? How does the wave get absorbed then? | |
| Jul 13, 2019 at 17:49 | comment | added | GiorgioP-DoomsdayClockIsAt-90 | @KoutaDagnino This is something which has to do with the set up of a workable model for the radiation inside the box. The simplest model is a set of stationary waves in the box. Which require the presence of odes at the walls. | |
| Jul 13, 2019 at 17:40 | comment | added | Kouta Dagnino | yes, thank you. But why does the wave have to have nodes at the walls of the box? | |
| Jul 13, 2019 at 17:26 | history | answered | GiorgioP-DoomsdayClockIsAt-90 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |