Skip to main content
deleted 2 characters in body
Source Link
jkien
  • 2.6k
  • 1
  • 14
  • 20

The classic demonstration of the photoelectric effect is discharging a negatively charged electroscope by illuminating zinc or aluminium connected to the electroscope with 254 nm light from a mercury lamp. Their threshold wavelength is ~290 nm. The demonstration with a germicidal lamp is like this: youtube video

Clothed likeDressed as a bank robber and wearing glasses, I repeated the demo with copper and iron, but with these metals the electroscope did not discharge. Why are copper and iron, in practice, apparently unsuitable for this demonstration? Their threshold wavelength is ~270 nm, so 254 nm light should induce the photoelectric effect in these metals. Is the relation between the current and $\Delta\lambda = (\lambda-\lambda_{\text{Threshold}})$ very nonlinear?

The classic demonstration of the photoelectric effect is discharging a negatively charged electroscope by illuminating zinc or aluminium connected to the electroscope with 254 nm light from a mercury lamp. Their threshold wavelength is ~290 nm. The demonstration with a germicidal lamp is like this: youtube video

Clothed like a bank robber and wearing glasses, I repeated the demo with copper and iron, but with these metals the electroscope did not discharge. Why are copper and iron, in practice, apparently unsuitable for this demonstration? Their threshold wavelength is ~270 nm, so 254 nm light should induce the photoelectric effect in these metals. Is the relation between the current and $\Delta\lambda = (\lambda-\lambda_{\text{Threshold}})$ very nonlinear?

The classic demonstration of the photoelectric effect is discharging a negatively charged electroscope by illuminating zinc or aluminium connected to the electroscope with 254 nm light from a mercury lamp. Their threshold wavelength is ~290 nm. The demonstration with a germicidal lamp is like this: youtube video

Dressed as a bank robber and wearing glasses, I repeated the demo with copper and iron, but with these metals the electroscope did not discharge. Why are copper and iron, in practice, apparently unsuitable for this demonstration? Their threshold wavelength is ~270 nm, so 254 nm light should induce the photoelectric effect in these metals. Is the relation between the current and $\Delta\lambda = (\lambda-\lambda_{\text{Threshold}})$ very nonlinear?

added 99 characters in body
Source Link
jkien
  • 2.6k
  • 1
  • 14
  • 20

The classic demonstration of the photoelectric effect is discharging a negatively charged electroscope by illuminating zinc or aluminium connected to the electroscope with 254 nm light from a mercury lamp. Their threshold wavelength is ~290 nm. The demonstration with a germicidal lamp is like this: youtube video

Clothed like a bank robber and wearing glasses, I repeated the demo with copper and iron, but with these metals the electroscope did not discharge. Why are copper and iron, in practice, apparently unsuitable for this demonstration? Their threshold wavelength is ~270 nm, so 254 nm light should induce the photoelectric effect in these metals. Is the relation between the current and $\Delta\lambda = (\lambda-\lambda_{\text{Threshold}})$ very nonlinear?

The classic demonstration of the photoelectric effect is discharging a negatively charged electroscope by illuminating zinc or aluminium connected to the electroscope with 254 nm light from a mercury lamp. Their threshold wavelength is ~290 nm. The demonstration with a germicidal lamp is like this: youtube video

Clothed like a bank robber, I repeated the demo with copper and iron, but with these metals the electroscope did not discharge. Why? Their threshold wavelength is ~270 nm, so 254 nm light should induce the photoelectric effect in these metals. Is the relation between the current and $\Delta\lambda = (\lambda-\lambda_{\text{Threshold}})$ very nonlinear?

The classic demonstration of the photoelectric effect is discharging a negatively charged electroscope by illuminating zinc or aluminium connected to the electroscope with 254 nm light from a mercury lamp. Their threshold wavelength is ~290 nm. The demonstration with a germicidal lamp is like this: youtube video

Clothed like a bank robber and wearing glasses, I repeated the demo with copper and iron, but with these metals the electroscope did not discharge. Why are copper and iron, in practice, apparently unsuitable for this demonstration? Their threshold wavelength is ~270 nm, so 254 nm light should induce the photoelectric effect in these metals. Is the relation between the current and $\Delta\lambda = (\lambda-\lambda_{\text{Threshold}})$ very nonlinear?

fixed latex
Source Link
jkien
  • 2.6k
  • 1
  • 14
  • 20

The classic demonstration of the photoelectric effect is discharging a negatively charged electroscope by illuminating zinc or aluminium connected to the electroscope with 254 nm light from a mercury lamp. Their threshold wavelength is ~290 nm. Why areThe demonstration with a germicidal lamp is like this: youtube video

Clothed like a bank robber, I repeated the demo with copper and iron, in practice, apparently unsuitable for this demonstrationbut with these metals the electroscope did not discharge. Why? Their threshold wavelength is ~270 nm, so it is natural to expect that 254 nm induceslight should induce the photoelectric effect in these metals. Why does it not happen? Is the relation between the current and $\Delta\lambda = (\lambda-\lambda_{\text{Threshold}})$ very nonlinear?

The classic demonstration of the photoelectric effect is discharging a negatively charged electroscope by illuminating zinc or aluminium connected to the electroscope with 254 nm light from a mercury lamp. Their threshold wavelength is ~290 nm. Why are copper and iron, in practice, apparently unsuitable for this demonstration? Their threshold wavelength is ~270 nm, so it is natural to expect that 254 nm induces the photoelectric effect in these metals. Why does it not happen? Is the relation between the current and $\Delta\lambda = (\lambda-\lambda_{\text{Threshold}})$ very nonlinear?

The classic demonstration of the photoelectric effect is discharging a negatively charged electroscope by illuminating zinc or aluminium connected to the electroscope with 254 nm light from a mercury lamp. Their threshold wavelength is ~290 nm. The demonstration with a germicidal lamp is like this: youtube video

Clothed like a bank robber, I repeated the demo with copper and iron, but with these metals the electroscope did not discharge. Why? Their threshold wavelength is ~270 nm, so 254 nm light should induce the photoelectric effect in these metals. Is the relation between the current and $\Delta\lambda = (\lambda-\lambda_{\text{Threshold}})$ very nonlinear?

Source Link
jkien
  • 2.6k
  • 1
  • 14
  • 20
Loading