Timeline for What is the temperature at which Napalm burns?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 15, 2019 at 21:42 | comment | added | jacobhobart | @JMac that's exactly what I said to her and she goes "Well I'm going off of what I've read, and what I've read is true." She must have read something written by a 3 year old. | |
May 15, 2019 at 21:34 | comment | added | jacobhobart | @Jitendra I'm an 18 year old highschool student. I knew from the get go that 4 million degrees wasn't even accurate. After a quick google search I got that ballpark number, and I raised my hand. She called on me and made my case that her claim was in fact false. She then just ignored what I said and told me I was wrong. Haha, it's always great when your education system has a teacher with PHD in History that is trying to give a brief explanation of some science related thing. I sure am glad my generation is being brainwashed. | |
May 15, 2019 at 2:37 | comment | added | Jitendra | The temperature of the order of millions is not even found on the surface of stars. Only the cores of stars can reach to that order of temperature through a nuclear reaction. The argument of your teacher is quite naive. | |
May 15, 2019 at 2:16 | comment | added | David White | Napalm is no doubt a hydrocarbon. Look up the flame temperature of gasoline in atmospheric air, and you will be in the right ball park. | |
May 14, 2019 at 20:20 | comment | added | Jon Custer | @JMac sure would make fusion machines easier! | |
May 14, 2019 at 20:12 | comment | added | JMac | @JonCuster Burning napalm, core of the sun; basically the same thing right? | |
May 14, 2019 at 20:07 | answer | added | Paul Young | timeline score: 2 | |
May 14, 2019 at 20:04 | comment | added | Jon Custer | 4 million is absolutely wrong, that is for sure... | |
May 14, 2019 at 20:00 | review | First posts | |||
May 15, 2019 at 2:38 | |||||
May 14, 2019 at 19:58 | history | asked | jacobhobart | CC BY-SA 4.0 |