Skip to main content
I hope this is an improvement. Please revert if you disagree.
Source Link
John Rennie
  • 362.7k
  • 132
  • 780
  • 1.1k

The four-momentum of a physical system is a conserved quantity in a particular reference frame. But we need a relativistic invariant theory which doesn't depend on the choice of coordinates. The squared four-momentum is indeed an invarianta scalar invariant, i.e., it doesn't depend on any reference frame. Thus a relativistic invariant theory requires a formulation based on invariant quantities.

The four-momentum of a physical system is a conserved quantity in a particular reference frame. But we need a relativistic invariant theory which doesn't depend on the choice of coordinates. The squared four-momentum is indeed an invariant, i.e., it doesn't depend on any reference frame. Thus a relativistic invariant theory requires a formulation based on invariant quantities.

The four-momentum of a physical system is a conserved quantity in a particular reference frame. But we need a relativistic invariant theory which doesn't depend on the choice of coordinates. The squared four-momentum is a scalar invariant, i.e., it doesn't depend on any reference frame. Thus a relativistic invariant theory requires a formulation based on invariant quantities.

Source Link
Richard
  • 2.1k
  • 14
  • 26

The four-momentum of a physical system is a conserved quantity in a particular reference frame. But we need a relativistic invariant theory which doesn't depend on the choice of coordinates. The squared four-momentum is indeed an invariant, i.e., it doesn't depend on any reference frame. Thus a relativistic invariant theory requires a formulation based on invariant quantities.