Timeline for Understanding the notion of lose or win of angular momentum in accretion disk
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2019 at 18:03 | comment | added | user87745 | Hi, could you take a look please quickly at my UPADTE1 ? thanks | |
| May 2, 2019 at 15:19 | comment | added | user87745 | Ok, like it is said in the other answer, I think maybe you want to mean that when an object (or a "cell of matter" assimilated to an object) looses angular momentum, it falls in lower orbit and when a ring wins angular momentum, mass goes to a higher orbit, is it a good summary ? So, there would be these 2 phenomena about the motion of mass of ring in an accretion disk which are still not well understood. Regards | |
| May 2, 2019 at 13:54 | comment | added | Farcher | @faya13 My answer is an attempt to illustrate the transfer of angular momentum rather than a detailed mechanism what happens when one ring “interacts” with another. As pointed out in another answer the mechanism of interaction is still not fully understood. | |
| May 2, 2019 at 13:41 | comment | added | user87745 |
Thanks for your detailled answer. But just one point, you say : In some way mass 𝑚 moves to a lower orbit b<a and mass m moves to a higher orbit c>a with the angular momentum conserved. but how do you justify this transfer of mass for inner part to the interior zone and the transfer of masse to outper zone : I think this is due to conservation of angular momentum but I don't grasp this dichotmy between the 2 parts of the 2m ring, could you explain please the 2 opposite directions ?
|
|
| May 2, 2019 at 10:02 | history | answered | Farcher | CC BY-SA 4.0 |