Skip to main content
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
added 4 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
Source Link
Qmechanic
  • 212.7k
  • 48
  • 589
  • 2.3k

First Order-Order Perturbation of Energy Eigenfunction

I have a homework questions where I'm struggling to understand the methodology to use. We derive first the energy functional for the energy eigenfunction equation (this is fine, I used some vector identities):

$$ E = \int d^3r \left[ \frac{\hbar}{2m} \nabla\Psi\cdot\nabla\Psi + V(\vec r)\Psi^2\right] $$$$ E = \int d^3r \left[ \frac{\hbar}{2m} \nabla\Psi\cdot\nabla\Psi + V(\vec r)\Psi^2\right]. $$ Then we are told to make the transformation

$$\Psi \to \Psi + \delta\Psi $$$$\Psi \to \Psi + \delta\Psi . $$

Noting the perturbation is conventionally normalised

$$\int d^3r (\Psi + \delta\Psi)^2 = 1$$$$\int d^3r (\Psi + \delta\Psi)^2 = 1.$$

The question asks to show the change in the energy functional vanishes to first order in $\delta\Psi$. I'm assuming that means show the $\delta$ terms of order 1 vanish but I have no idea how to go about that. If I straight up plug in the transformation into the energy functional I think we get the below expression on RHS:

$$\int d^3r \left[ \frac{\hbar}{2m} \nabla(\Psi+\delta\Psi)\cdot\nabla(\Psi+\delta\Psi) + V(\vec r)(\Psi+\delta\Psi)^2\right]$$$$\int d^3r \left[ \frac{\hbar}{2m} \nabla(\Psi+\delta\Psi)\cdot\nabla(\Psi+\delta\Psi) + V(\vec r)(\Psi+\delta\Psi)^2\right].$$

Any tips from here? We haven't covered perturbation theory or calculus of variations.. Do I need to look at the small change in the LHS as well ($E + \delta E$) and express that as a power series? I'm still not sure how that would help.

First Order Perturbation of Energy Eigenfunction

I have a homework questions where I'm struggling to understand the methodology to use. We derive first the energy functional for the energy eigenfunction equation (this is fine, I used some vector identities):

$$ E = \int d^3r \left[ \frac{\hbar}{2m} \nabla\Psi\cdot\nabla\Psi + V(\vec r)\Psi^2\right] $$ Then we are told to make the transformation

$$\Psi \to \Psi + \delta\Psi $$

Noting the perturbation is conventionally normalised

$$\int d^3r (\Psi + \delta\Psi)^2 = 1$$

The question asks to show the change in the energy functional vanishes to first order in $\delta\Psi$. I'm assuming that means show the $\delta$ terms of order 1 vanish but I have no idea how to go about that. If I straight up plug in the transformation into the energy functional I think we get the below expression on RHS:

$$\int d^3r \left[ \frac{\hbar}{2m} \nabla(\Psi+\delta\Psi)\cdot\nabla(\Psi+\delta\Psi) + V(\vec r)(\Psi+\delta\Psi)^2\right]$$

Any tips from here? We haven't covered perturbation theory or calculus of variations.. Do I need to look at the small change in the LHS as well ($E + \delta E$) and express that as a power series? I'm still not sure how that would help.

First-Order Perturbation of Energy Eigenfunction

I have a homework questions where I'm struggling to understand the methodology to use. We derive first the energy functional for the energy eigenfunction equation (this is fine, I used some vector identities):

$$ E = \int d^3r \left[ \frac{\hbar}{2m} \nabla\Psi\cdot\nabla\Psi + V(\vec r)\Psi^2\right]. $$ Then we are told to make the transformation

$$\Psi \to \Psi + \delta\Psi . $$

Noting the perturbation is conventionally normalised

$$\int d^3r (\Psi + \delta\Psi)^2 = 1.$$

The question asks to show the change in the energy functional vanishes to first order in $\delta\Psi$. I'm assuming that means show the $\delta$ terms of order 1 vanish but I have no idea how to go about that. If I straight up plug in the transformation into the energy functional I think we get the below expression on RHS:

$$\int d^3r \left[ \frac{\hbar}{2m} \nabla(\Psi+\delta\Psi)\cdot\nabla(\Psi+\delta\Psi) + V(\vec r)(\Psi+\delta\Psi)^2\right].$$

Any tips from here? We haven't covered perturbation theory or calculus of variations.. Do I need to look at the small change in the LHS as well ($E + \delta E$) and express that as a power series? I'm still not sure how that would help.

added 14 characters in body
Source Link

I have a homework questions where I'm struggling to understand the methodology to use. We derive first the energy functional for the energy eigenfunction equation (this is fine, I used some vector identities):

$$ E = \int d^3r \left[ \frac{\hbar}{2m} \nabla\Psi\cdot\nabla\Psi + V(\vec r)\Psi^2\right] $$ Then we are told to make the transformation

$$\Psi \to \Psi + \delta\Psi $$

Noting the perturbation is conventionally normalised

$$\int d^3r (\Psi + \delta\Psi)^2 = 1$$

The question asks to show the change in the energy functional vanishes to first order in $\delta\Psi$. I'm assuming that means show the $\delta$ terms of order 1 vanish but I have no idea how to go about that. If I straight up plug in the transformation into the energy functional I think we get the below expression on RHS:

$$\int d^3r \ (1+\delta)^2\left[ \frac{\hbar}{2m} \nabla\Psi\cdot\nabla\Psi + V(\vec r)\Psi^2\right]$$$$\int d^3r \left[ \frac{\hbar}{2m} \nabla(\Psi+\delta\Psi)\cdot\nabla(\Psi+\delta\Psi) + V(\vec r)(\Psi+\delta\Psi)^2\right]$$

Any tips from here? We haven't covered perturbation theory or calculus of variations.. Do I need to look at the small change in the LHS as well ($E + \delta E$) and express that as a power series? I'm still not sure how that would help.

I have a homework questions where I'm struggling to understand the methodology to use. We derive first the energy functional for the energy eigenfunction equation (this is fine, I used some vector identities):

$$ E = \int d^3r \left[ \frac{\hbar}{2m} \nabla\Psi\cdot\nabla\Psi + V(\vec r)\Psi^2\right] $$ Then we are told to make the transformation

$$\Psi \to \Psi + \delta\Psi $$

Noting the perturbation is conventionally normalised

$$\int d^3r (\Psi + \delta\Psi)^2 = 1$$

The question asks to show the change in the energy functional vanishes to first order in $\delta\Psi$. I'm assuming that means show the $\delta$ terms of order 1 vanish but I have no idea how to go about that. If I straight up plug in the transformation into the energy functional I think we get the below expression on RHS:

$$\int d^3r \ (1+\delta)^2\left[ \frac{\hbar}{2m} \nabla\Psi\cdot\nabla\Psi + V(\vec r)\Psi^2\right]$$

Any tips from here? We haven't covered perturbation theory or calculus of variations.. Do I need to look at the small change in the LHS as well ($E + \delta E$) and express that as a power series? I'm still not sure how that would help.

I have a homework questions where I'm struggling to understand the methodology to use. We derive first the energy functional for the energy eigenfunction equation (this is fine, I used some vector identities):

$$ E = \int d^3r \left[ \frac{\hbar}{2m} \nabla\Psi\cdot\nabla\Psi + V(\vec r)\Psi^2\right] $$ Then we are told to make the transformation

$$\Psi \to \Psi + \delta\Psi $$

Noting the perturbation is conventionally normalised

$$\int d^3r (\Psi + \delta\Psi)^2 = 1$$

The question asks to show the change in the energy functional vanishes to first order in $\delta\Psi$. I'm assuming that means show the $\delta$ terms of order 1 vanish but I have no idea how to go about that. If I straight up plug in the transformation into the energy functional I think we get the below expression on RHS:

$$\int d^3r \left[ \frac{\hbar}{2m} \nabla(\Psi+\delta\Psi)\cdot\nabla(\Psi+\delta\Psi) + V(\vec r)(\Psi+\delta\Psi)^2\right]$$

Any tips from here? We haven't covered perturbation theory or calculus of variations.. Do I need to look at the small change in the LHS as well ($E + \delta E$) and express that as a power series? I'm still not sure how that would help.

added 39 characters in body
Source Link
Emilio Pisanty
  • 135.3k
  • 33
  • 358
  • 677

I have a homework questions where I'm struggling to understand the methodology to use. We derive first the energy functional for the energy eigenfunction equation (this is fine, I used some vector identities):

E = $\int d^3r [ \frac{\hbar}{2m} \nabla\Psi.\nabla\Psi + V(\vec r)\Psi^2]$

Then$$ E = \int d^3r \left[ \frac{\hbar}{2m} \nabla\Psi\cdot\nabla\Psi + V(\vec r)\Psi^2\right] $$ Then we are told to make the transformation

$\Psi \to \Psi + \delta\Psi $$$\Psi \to \Psi + \delta\Psi $$

Noting the perturbation is conventionally normalised

$\int d^3r (\Psi + \delta\Psi)^2 = 1$$$\int d^3r (\Psi + \delta\Psi)^2 = 1$$

The question asks to show the change in the energy functional vanishes to first order in $\delta\Psi$. I'm assuming that means show the $\delta$ terms of order 1 vanish but I have no idea how to go about that. If I straight up plug in the transformation into the energy functional I think we get the below expression on RHS:

$\int d^3r [(1+\delta)^2][ \frac{\hbar}{2m} \nabla\Psi.\nabla\Psi + V(\vec r)\Psi^2]$$$\int d^3r \ (1+\delta)^2\left[ \frac{\hbar}{2m} \nabla\Psi\cdot\nabla\Psi + V(\vec r)\Psi^2\right]$$

Any tips from here? We haven't covered perturbation theory or calculus of variations.. Do I need to look at the small change in the LHS as well ($E + \delta E$) and express that as a power series? I'm still not sure how that would help.

I have a homework questions where I'm struggling to understand the methodology to use. We derive first the energy functional for the energy eigenfunction equation (this is fine, I used some vector identities):

E = $\int d^3r [ \frac{\hbar}{2m} \nabla\Psi.\nabla\Psi + V(\vec r)\Psi^2]$

Then we are told to make the transformation

$\Psi \to \Psi + \delta\Psi $

Noting the perturbation is conventionally normalised

$\int d^3r (\Psi + \delta\Psi)^2 = 1$

The question asks to show the change in the energy functional vanishes to first order in $\delta\Psi$. I'm assuming that means show the $\delta$ terms of order 1 vanish but I have no idea how to go about that. If I straight up plug in the transformation into the energy functional I think we get the below expression on RHS:

$\int d^3r [(1+\delta)^2][ \frac{\hbar}{2m} \nabla\Psi.\nabla\Psi + V(\vec r)\Psi^2]$

Any tips from here? We haven't covered perturbation theory or calculus of variations.. Do I need to look at the small change in the LHS as well ($E + \delta E$) and express that as a power series? I'm still not sure how that would help.

I have a homework questions where I'm struggling to understand the methodology to use. We derive first the energy functional for the energy eigenfunction equation (this is fine, I used some vector identities):

$$ E = \int d^3r \left[ \frac{\hbar}{2m} \nabla\Psi\cdot\nabla\Psi + V(\vec r)\Psi^2\right] $$ Then we are told to make the transformation

$$\Psi \to \Psi + \delta\Psi $$

Noting the perturbation is conventionally normalised

$$\int d^3r (\Psi + \delta\Psi)^2 = 1$$

The question asks to show the change in the energy functional vanishes to first order in $\delta\Psi$. I'm assuming that means show the $\delta$ terms of order 1 vanish but I have no idea how to go about that. If I straight up plug in the transformation into the energy functional I think we get the below expression on RHS:

$$\int d^3r \ (1+\delta)^2\left[ \frac{\hbar}{2m} \nabla\Psi\cdot\nabla\Psi + V(\vec r)\Psi^2\right]$$

Any tips from here? We haven't covered perturbation theory or calculus of variations.. Do I need to look at the small change in the LHS as well ($E + \delta E$) and express that as a power series? I'm still not sure how that would help.

added 153 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
Source Link
Loading