Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 31, 2020 at 14:13 history edited Qmechanic CC BY-SA 4.0
Minor formatting
Apr 8, 2019 at 1:03 comment added user267839 so the tool here is "to apply to test functions"?
Apr 8, 2019 at 1:01 vote accept user267839
Apr 7, 2019 at 10:58 history edited Qmechanic CC BY-SA 4.0
Added explanation
Apr 7, 2019 at 10:57 comment added Qmechanic For starters, eq. (2') applies to functions, not functionals.
Apr 7, 2019 at 2:26 comment added user267839 So this contradicts (2') or do I have overseen something? Futhermore - assume that my calculations are just wrong - how to verify that (2') holds in general?
Apr 7, 2019 at 2:26 comment added user267839 I'm not sure which "simple cases" you have in mind but I think that we can take for example the "evaluation functional" $ F_{t_0}: M \to R, f \mapsto f(x_0)$ at $t_0$. Then the right hand side of (*) is $\phi(x_0)$ and on the left side we are looking for a $\frac{\delta F}{\delta\rho}(t) $ such that the integral equals $\phi(t_0)$. We see that $\frac{\delta F}{\delta\rho}(t):= \delta(t -t_0) $ solves the problem. But $\frac{\delta F}{\delta\rho(t')}(t) \neq \delta(t -t_0) \frac{\partial}{\partial \rho(t)} F$.
Apr 7, 2019 at 2:26 comment added user267839 the only applyable tool to calculate $\frac{\delta}{\delta q^j(t^{\prime})}$ I found at your linked wiki page en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functional_derivative. Here it is stated that for every functional $F\colon M \rightarrow \mathbb{R} $ by definition holds (*)$\begin{align} \int \frac{\delta F}{\delta\rho}(x) \phi(x) \; dx &= \lim_{\varepsilon\to 0}\frac{F[\rho+\varepsilon \phi]-F[\rho]}{\varepsilon} \\&= \left [ \frac{d}{d\epsilon}F[\rho+\epsilon \phi]\right ]_{\epsilon=0},\end{align}$
Apr 6, 2019 at 20:40 comment added user267839 Hi. Thank you for your enlightening explanations. One point is unclear: how do you obtain the expression $(2')$ for $\frac{\delta}{\delta q^j(t^{\prime})} $?
Apr 6, 2019 at 11:33 history answered Qmechanic CC BY-SA 4.0