Timeline for Same energies are transferred to 2 objects. But they gain different amounts of energy. Where is the mistake?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 21, 2019 at 16:56 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
Mar 21, 2019 at 12:38 | history | edited | user223571 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 34 characters in body
|
Mar 21, 2019 at 0:53 | answer | added | Dale | timeline score: 1 | |
Mar 21, 2019 at 0:25 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ |
edited tags
|
|
Mar 21, 2019 at 0:17 | comment | added | Gert | Definitely diagram needed! | |
Mar 20, 2019 at 23:40 | comment | added | user223571 | @knzhou. It seems to me my situation is a little different. In my situation (as it seems to me) the energies that power winches "A" are same. And in the situation in the link the fuels' initial energies were different. | |
Mar 20, 2019 at 23:20 | comment | added | user223571 | In both cases winches B wind the rope with constant, but different rates | |
Mar 20, 2019 at 23:11 | comment | added | Alfred Centauri | As written, it almost sounds as if winch B will act to cancel any winding done by winch A (Winch “B” winds the rope in a way that it keeps the rope streached, but it doesn’t draw it). To be clear, is the winding rate of winch B on each object constant? | |
Mar 20, 2019 at 22:56 | comment | added | knzhou | The setup is a little unclear, but if it's what I think it is, it's a duplicate of this. | |
Mar 20, 2019 at 22:55 | comment | added | Charlie | Do you think you could post a diagram? It would be better to visualize the situation, since this seems very strange. In any case, remember that the total energy of the system (object and winches) should remain constant. | |
Mar 20, 2019 at 22:51 | history | asked | user223571 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |