Timeline for Recovering symmetry in coupled oscillators
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
24 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2022 at 10:10 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Feb 24, 2022 at 7:04 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Oct 25, 2021 at 20:05 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jun 27, 2021 at 15:17 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jun 28, 2021 at 16:37 | |||||
| Jun 27, 2021 at 13:07 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| May 16, 2021 at 3:47 | answer | added | ZeroTheHero | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 15, 2021 at 21:23 | comment | added | Voulkos | Related : Lagrangian for two coupled second order linear differential equations. | |
| May 15, 2021 at 20:04 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jan 15, 2021 at 9:01 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Sep 14, 2020 at 12:01 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| May 10, 2020 at 14:03 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jan 10, 2020 at 7:00 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Mar 18, 2019 at 16:21 | answer | added | Elio Fabri | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 16, 2019 at 23:06 | comment | added | knzhou | I suppose you could write the matrix in general as $a_0 I + \vec{a} \cdot \vec{\sigma}$ and then apply a rotation (by conjugating with $e^{- i \theta \hat{n} \cdot \vec{\sigma}}$) to align $\vec{a}$ with $\hat{x}$. However, doing this explicitly might be more complicated than doing it the normal way. | |
| Mar 16, 2019 at 19:55 | answer | added | InertialObserver | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 16, 2019 at 19:17 | comment | added | DanielSank | @InertialObserver Yes I know about matrix diagonalization, and yes this is a question about coupled oscillators. The equation ($\star$) are the equations of two coupled electrical harmonic oscillators. The question is how to diagonalize the matrix (i.e. decouple the equations of motion) in a systematic way when the oscillators are not identical. | |
| Mar 16, 2019 at 19:00 | comment | added | InertialObserver | I don’t understand.. this isn’t a problem about coupled oscillators then.. do you know about matrix diagonalization? | |
| Mar 16, 2019 at 18:59 | comment | added | DanielSank | @InertialObserver Finding that basis in a systematic way is exactly the point of this question. | |
| Mar 16, 2019 at 18:56 | comment | added | InertialObserver | Have you tried working in a basis where the matrix is diagonal? | |
| Mar 16, 2019 at 18:01 | history | edited | DanielSank | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Add footnote about frequencies
|
| Mar 16, 2019 at 18:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/1106978555894861825 | ||
| Mar 16, 2019 at 8:07 | history | edited | DanielSank |
Remove dimensional analysis tag
|
|
| Mar 16, 2019 at 7:58 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ |
edited tags; edited tags
|
|
| Mar 16, 2019 at 7:16 | history | asked | DanielSank | CC BY-SA 4.0 |