Timeline for Change of specific internal energy due to temperature and volume
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 1, 2019 at 12:33 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body; edited tags; edited title; edited tags
|
Mar 1, 2019 at 12:31 | comment | added | Chet Miller | If you're asking whether U, Cv, and V can be either per mole of per unit mass, the answer is "yes" provided all three quantities have consistent units. | |
Mar 1, 2019 at 12:31 | vote | accept | OD IUM | ||
Mar 1, 2019 at 12:28 | answer | added | GiorgioP-DoomsdayClockIsAt-90 | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 1, 2019 at 12:18 | comment | added | OD IUM | Well that's the problem. The volume changes and so does the mass (specific volume= 1/density). But the above equation takes care of volume-change by means of the second term. Without change in volume I'd just need c_V*dT | |
Mar 1, 2019 at 12:02 | comment | added | BioPhysicist | I mean if that puts the equation in terms of values you need, then go for it. Unless your mass isn't constant, then the step probably wouldn't be valid anymore. | |
Mar 1, 2019 at 12:00 | comment | added | OD IUM | that's my question. | |
Mar 1, 2019 at 11:57 | comment | added | BioPhysicist | You can't just divide both sides of the equation by the mass? | |
Mar 1, 2019 at 11:17 | answer | added | Cinaed Simson | timeline score: -1 | |
Mar 1, 2019 at 10:13 | history | asked | OD IUM | CC BY-SA 4.0 |