Timeline for Is observable universe an explanation against Olbers' paradox?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6 at 18:45 | comment | added | pygosceles | See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extinction_(astronomy) | |
| Mar 5 at 23:00 | answer | added | pygosceles | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 5 at 19:14 | comment | converted from answer | Robert Tucker | All the answers are based on the limits of our minds to grasp the concept of infinity; so, we do what we can by utilizing the concept of the observable universe, which is reasonable, for now. What lies beyond? You and I will never know. Perhaps some distant future relative will. | |
| Dec 11, 2012 at 11:02 | vote | accept | none | ||
| Dec 9, 2012 at 22:19 | comment | added | arivero | People answering here, please remember, when stating the paradox, that light from distant sources goes down as the square of distance. | |
| Dec 9, 2012 at 16:02 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPhysics/status/277805377234550785 | ||
| Dec 9, 2012 at 15:28 | answer | added | Kitchi | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 9, 2012 at 13:42 | answer | added | Johannes | timeline score: 4 | |
| Dec 9, 2012 at 12:50 | answer | added | anna v | timeline score: 4 | |
| Dec 9, 2012 at 12:42 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 9, 2012 at 13:32 | |||||
| Dec 9, 2012 at 12:40 | comment | added | Qmechanic♦ | Related: physics.stackexchange.com/q/11014/2451 and physics.stackexchange.com/q/26613/2451 | |
| Dec 9, 2012 at 12:39 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
retagged;
|
| Dec 9, 2012 at 12:25 | history | asked | none | CC BY-SA 3.0 |