Skip to main content
Physics

Return to Answer

Corrected some Typos which caused me to read parts twice.
Source Link
Jim
Jim
  • 24.6k
  • 3
  • 73
  • 126

there is no interference if the slit is infinitesimal.

But in this regard infinitesimal is whatswhat's smaller thenthan a wavelength (maybe half wave lengthwavelength as iI don't remember the exact solution).

But if it is larger thenthan that you can say that it is composed of several infinitesimal slits next to each other with 0 distance between them. youYou do get interference.

I think you can understand the second part if, if you look at the distance between the dark parts. theyThey have the same width and their distancedistances from the middle are the same

there is no interference if the slit is infinitesimal.

But in this regard infinitesimal is whats smaller then a wavelength (maybe half wave length as i don't remember the exact solution).

But if it is larger then that you can say that it is composed of several infinitesimal slits next to each other with 0 distance between them. you do get interference.

I think you can understand the second part if you look at the distance between the dark parts. they have the same width and their distance from the middle are the same

there is no interference if the slit is infinitesimal.

But in this regard infinitesimal is what's smaller than a wavelength (maybe half wavelength as I don't remember the exact solution).

But if it is larger than that you can say that it is composed of several infinitesimal slits next to each other with 0 distance between them. You do get interference.

I think you can understand the second part, if you look at the distance between the dark parts. They have the same width and their distances from the middle are the same

Corrected some Typos which caused me to read parts twice.
Source Link
edit approved Feb 28, 2019 at 15:03
trikPu
edit approved Feb 28, 2019 at 15:03
trikPu
  • 178
  • 4

there is no interference if the slit is infinitesimal.

But in this regard infinitesimal is whats smaller then a wavelength (maybe half wave length as i don't remember the exact solution).

But if it is larger then that you can say that it is composed of several infinitesimal slits next to each other with 0 distance between them. you do get interference.

i thingI think you can understand the second part if you look at the distance between the dark parts. they have the same width and their distance from the middle are the same

there is no interference if the slit is infinitesimal.

But in this regard infinitesimal is whats smaller then a wavelength (maybe half wave length as i don't remember the exact solution).

But it is larger then that you can say that it is composed of several infinitesimal slits next to each other with 0 distance between them. you do get interference.

i thing you can understand the second part if you look at the distance between the dark parts. they have the same width and their distance from the middle are the same

there is no interference if the slit is infinitesimal.

But in this regard infinitesimal is whats smaller then a wavelength (maybe half wave length as i don't remember the exact solution).

But if it is larger then that you can say that it is composed of several infinitesimal slits next to each other with 0 distance between them. you do get interference.

I think you can understand the second part if you look at the distance between the dark parts. they have the same width and their distance from the middle are the same

Source Link
os20
os20
  • 25
  • 6

there is no interference if the slit is infinitesimal.

But in this regard infinitesimal is whats smaller then a wavelength (maybe half wave length as i don't remember the exact solution).

But it is larger then that you can say that it is composed of several infinitesimal slits next to each other with 0 distance between them. you do get interference.

i thing you can understand the second part if you look at the distance between the dark parts. they have the same width and their distance from the middle are the same