Timeline for Why intuitively, do we define symmetries as transformations that map solutions of the equations of motion into other solutions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2019 at 9:11 | vote | accept | jak | ||
| S Mar 9, 2019 at 7:03 | history | bounty ended | jak | ||
| S Mar 9, 2019 at 7:03 | history | notice removed | jak | ||
| Mar 6, 2019 at 17:41 | answer | added | Abdelmalek Abdesselam | timeline score: 3 | |
| Mar 5, 2019 at 11:03 | answer | added | physshyp | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 1, 2019 at 21:38 | answer | added | Chiral Anomaly | timeline score: 7 | |
| Mar 1, 2019 at 20:28 | comment | added | Cosmas Zachos | You want intuition on how a parity-symmetric equation has parity map the solution set onto itself, permuting the elements, beyond the formal demonstration? | |
| Mar 1, 2019 at 18:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/1101542772207689728 | ||
| S Mar 1, 2019 at 16:44 | history | bounty started | jak | ||
| S Mar 1, 2019 at 16:44 | history | notice added | jak | Draw attention | |
| Feb 26, 2019 at 10:34 | history | edited | jak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Feb 22, 2019 at 10:31 | history | edited | jak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
| Feb 21, 2019 at 9:55 | comment | added | Qmechanic♦ | If you like this question you may also enjoy reading this Phys.SE post. | |
| Feb 21, 2019 at 9:53 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 21, 2019 at 9:16 | history | edited | jak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Feb 20, 2019 at 19:32 | history | asked | jak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |