Timeline for How do anomalies affect the field equations of motion?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 26, 2019 at 0:46 | vote | accept | knzhou | ||
S Feb 26, 2019 at 0:46 | history | bounty ended | knzhou | ||
S Feb 26, 2019 at 0:46 | history | notice removed | knzhou | ||
Feb 19, 2019 at 3:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/1097692433704513537 | ||
Feb 18, 2019 at 22:45 | answer | added | AccidentalFourierTransform | timeline score: 7 | |
Feb 18, 2019 at 22:17 | answer | added | Nogueira | timeline score: 3 | |
S Feb 18, 2019 at 21:43 | history | bounty started | knzhou | ||
S Feb 18, 2019 at 21:43 | history | notice added | knzhou | Draw attention | |
Feb 14, 2019 at 20:55 | comment | added | ACuriousMind♦ | Possible (though unanswered) duplicates: physics.stackexchange.com/q/107098/50583, physics.stackexchange.com/q/261956/50583 (If I get bored this weekend I might try to expand my comment to tparker's question into ananswer) Note that your "affect the equations of motion" is really the same as "in the operator formalism" since in the path-integral formalism we show validity of equations of motion as equations of quantum expectation values by the derivation of the Schwinger-Dyson equation under the assumption that the measure is invariant, i.e. the theory is non-anomalous. | |
Feb 14, 2019 at 20:35 | history | asked | knzhou | CC BY-SA 4.0 |