Timeline for Gamma spectrometry: effect on one peak when adding another source
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2019 at 18:48 | history | edited | user4552 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 14 characters in body
|
| Mar 23, 2019 at 16:54 | history | edited | ggs | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
dead timr and individual counts
|
| Feb 12, 2019 at 18:49 | comment | added | ggs | Sir, what I understand is net peak area/ time shall give count rate. U can correct me if I am wrong. So u can answer in the above scenario, what will happen? | |
| Feb 12, 2019 at 16:52 | comment | added | jaromrax | @BillN - yes, good point, there is a difference, now the question would make a different sense. | |
| Feb 12, 2019 at 16:32 | comment | added | Bill N | Are you asking about the real peak area, or the count rate in the channels where the peak is located? | |
| Feb 12, 2019 at 15:26 | comment | added | jaromrax | Ok.............. | |
| Feb 12, 2019 at 15:20 | comment | added | ggs | It is not a homework Q. | |
| Feb 12, 2019 at 14:43 | answer | added | jaromrax | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 12, 2019 at 14:39 | comment | added | jaromrax | Hello, if it is a homework question, you should add a tag for clarity. Despite a potential drawbacks. | |
| Feb 12, 2019 at 14:37 | history | asked | ggs | CC BY-SA 4.0 |