Skip to main content
16 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 26, 2019 at 16:08 history closed garyp
Kyle Kanos
GiorgioP-DoomsdayClockIsAt-90
ZeroTheHero
user20427
Needs more focus
Feb 25, 2019 at 3:40 history edited joshuaronis CC BY-SA 4.0
edited title
Feb 25, 2019 at 2:25 review Close votes
Feb 26, 2019 at 16:10
Feb 25, 2019 at 2:04 history edited joshuaronis CC BY-SA 4.0
added 497 characters in body
Feb 25, 2019 at 1:45 history edited joshuaronis CC BY-SA 4.0
edited title
Feb 10, 2019 at 12:00 history tweeted twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/1094566783397359616
Feb 9, 2019 at 21:44 history edited joshuaronis CC BY-SA 4.0
added the possibility for a 2 dimensional universe
Feb 9, 2019 at 21:42 comment added Eli The new earth gravity will be $g_n=R\,g$ , where R is the earth radius. I assume that G ist constant?
Feb 9, 2019 at 18:31 comment added joshuaronis @Qmechanic both 2+1D and 3+1D! Thanks!
Feb 9, 2019 at 18:31 comment added joshuaronis @Chris yep I got the question, I'm just thinking about it. I guess it makes sense geometrically that if the world was (2+1)D that forces would be inverse $r$ instead of inverse $r^2$. However, I'm still confused about what the consequences would be...so I guess the answer is...both?
Feb 9, 2019 at 17:39 comment added Chris To be more verbose about what Qmechanic is asking, are you asking this question in the context of a 2+1 dimensional universe (2 dimensions of space+1 of time) or a 3+1D universe like our own?
Feb 9, 2019 at 16:38 history edited Qmechanic CC BY-SA 4.0
added 2 characters in body
Feb 9, 2019 at 16:37 history edited Nat CC BY-SA 4.0
added 61 characters in body; edited tags
Feb 9, 2019 at 16:36 history edited Qmechanic CC BY-SA 4.0
edited body; edited tags
Feb 9, 2019 at 16:34 comment added Qmechanic $\uparrow$ 2+1D?
Feb 9, 2019 at 16:23 history asked joshuaronis CC BY-SA 4.0