Timeline for Can quantum randomness be somehow explained by classical uncertainty?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2019 at 7:54 | comment | added | anna v | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hidden-variable_theory . Bells theorem constrains them to be non local | |
| Feb 5, 2019 at 7:52 | comment | added | anna v | QM probability is $Ψ*Ψ$ , the complex conjugate $Ψ*$ squared with the $Ψ$.. Bohm's model does reproduce non relativistic QM, that is why it is called an interpretation of quantum mechanics, because it is local.. The statistical argument does not suffice for complicated models aiming at finding a classical physics explanation of quantum mechanics. locality does. look at deterministic proposals en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… | |
| Feb 5, 2019 at 7:24 | history | edited | anna v | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
punctuation
|
| Feb 5, 2019 at 6:56 | comment | added | Alex L | What I have heard is that the quantum probability is obtained from Born's rule, which is psi-squared. A classical uncontrollable (and unpredictable in practice, not in principle) factor such as noise or chaos cannot produce probability distributions we get from Born's rule, for example such a classical distribution would be Gaussian. Is this correct? This doesn't have anything to do with Bell's theorem. | |
| Feb 5, 2019 at 6:04 | history | answered | anna v | CC BY-SA 4.0 |