Timeline for Why can we say that at zero absolute temperature is there only one accesible state?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2019 at 18:14 | comment | added | valerio | Related (possible duplicate?): physics.stackexchange.com/questions/260978/… | |
| Feb 3, 2019 at 22:08 | answer | added | GiorgioP-DoomsdayClockIsAt-90 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 3, 2019 at 20:38 | comment | added | dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten | Related? physics.stackexchange.com/questions/299331/… | |
| Feb 3, 2019 at 20:27 | comment | added | miguel pedraza | @ACuriousMind not the same question, thelast answer only takes he numbe of miscrostates as 1 but does not explain why | |
| Feb 3, 2019 at 20:16 | comment | added | ACuriousMind♦ | Possible duplicate: physics.stackexchange.com/q/109941/50583 and its linked questions | |
| Feb 3, 2019 at 20:10 | comment | added | Peter Shor | If zero-termperature quantum states can be degenerate, then it's not true. But that requires some kind of unbroken symmetry. | |
| Feb 3, 2019 at 20:07 | history | asked | miguel pedraza | CC BY-SA 4.0 |