Timeline for How does one deal with derivative operator in quantum field theory properly?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 4, 2019 at 15:46 | vote | accept | Universe Maintainer | ||
Feb 4, 2019 at 15:46 | comment | added | Universe Maintainer | Oh, Thanks. The delta function part is correct. It's the other part of HN that is wrong. Now I get everything correct! | |
Feb 4, 2019 at 15:28 | comment | added | Qmechanic♦ | FWIW, eq. (8) & (9) are fine. | |
Feb 4, 2019 at 14:56 | comment | added | Universe Maintainer | I updated my derivation of the delta function part. Could you please tell me what's wrong with it? | |
Feb 4, 2019 at 10:39 | comment | added | Universe Maintainer | Thank you! but i still haven't figure out how to deal with the delta function part. | |
Feb 3, 2019 at 14:47 | comment | added | Qmechanic♦ | FWIW, eq. (6) is fine but eq. (7) is not. | |
Feb 3, 2019 at 14:35 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added explanation
|
Feb 3, 2019 at 14:13 | comment | added | Universe Maintainer | Thanks for pointing that out! Following your hints I get it done. However, I am still confused why my way doesn't work. | |
Feb 3, 2019 at 14:00 | history | answered | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |