Timeline for Wick rotation vs. Feynman $i\varepsilon$-prescription
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 at 13:10 | comment | added | Qmechanic♦ | Notes for later: \begin{align} t(\theta) ~=~& e^{-i\theta} t_E, \qquad \theta~\in~[0,\frac{\pi}{2}], \cr t(\theta\!=\!0)~=~&t_E, \qquad t(\theta\!=\!\frac{\pi}{2})~=~-it_E=t_M. \end{align} | |
| Sep 25 at 7:34 | comment | added | Qmechanic♦ | Notes to self: Hm. There still seems to be room for a sign ambiguity in interpretation, cf. physics.stackexchange.com/q/828807/2451 | |
| Oct 2, 2022 at 8:37 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Minor formatting
|
| Jan 31, 2019 at 23:39 | vote | accept | P. C. Spaniel | ||
| Jan 31, 2019 at 21:52 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added explanation
|
| Jan 30, 2019 at 18:44 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added explanation
|
| Jan 30, 2019 at 18:13 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added explanation
|
| Jan 30, 2019 at 17:55 | history | answered | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |