Timeline for Why are some symmetries invisible to the configuration space Lagrangian $L(q, \dot q,t)$?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2019 at 6:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/1089402768937365504 | ||
| Jan 25, 2019 at 10:07 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Included t just to be general.
|
| Jan 24, 2019 at 20:10 | answer | added | Qmechanic♦ | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 24, 2019 at 19:54 | comment | added | bolbteppa | Laplace Runge Lenz arises because the Hamilton-Jacobi equation (which is not Hamiltonian mechanics it's it's own formulation) for the action in the Kepler problem is superintegrable en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… and it can be formulated in a strictly Lagrangian setting using a transformation involving just position and velocity, see aapt.scitation.org/doi/10.1119/1.1986202 | |
| Jan 24, 2019 at 19:42 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 57 characters in body; edited tags
|
| Jan 24, 2019 at 19:36 | history | asked | user1379857 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |