Skip to main content
Added explanation
Source Link
Qmechanic
  • 212.8k
  • 48
  • 589
  • 2.3k

That seems to be a misunderstanding. Velocity-dependent/generalized potentials $U(q,\dot{q},t)$ are allowed in Lagrangian mechanics. See e.g. this, this, this & this related Phys.SE posts.

  1. That seems to be a misunderstanding. Velocity-dependent/generalized potentials $U(q,\dot{q},t)$ are allowed in Lagrangian mechanics. See e.g. this, this, this & this related Phys.SE posts.

  2. It should be stressed that a generalized force $Q_j$ might not have a potential, not even a velocity-dependent/generalized potential. Example: Dissipative forces.

That seems to be a misunderstanding. Velocity-dependent/generalized potentials $U(q,\dot{q},t)$ are allowed in Lagrangian mechanics. See e.g. this, this, this & this related Phys.SE posts.

  1. That seems to be a misunderstanding. Velocity-dependent/generalized potentials $U(q,\dot{q},t)$ are allowed in Lagrangian mechanics. See e.g. this, this, this & this related Phys.SE posts.

  2. It should be stressed that a generalized force $Q_j$ might not have a potential, not even a velocity-dependent/generalized potential. Example: Dissipative forces.

Source Link
Qmechanic
  • 212.8k
  • 48
  • 589
  • 2.3k

That seems to be a misunderstanding. Velocity-dependent/generalized potentials $U(q,\dot{q},t)$ are allowed in Lagrangian mechanics. See e.g. this, this, this & this related Phys.SE posts.