Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 9, 2019 at 10:04 comment added AfterShave Okay, I see. But don't different schemes alter the momentum depnendecy of the dressed propagator? It doesn't seem obvious to me that these should all drop out when we calculate observable effects.
Jan 8, 2019 at 0:59 comment added InertialObserver It could seem so at first. But the correction to the coulomb potential is $\propto \frac{e_P^2}{m_P^2} \delta^3(x)$, and so it only depends on physical quantities, which are just numbers.
Jan 8, 2019 at 0:43 comment added AfterShave Okay but doesn't the Green's function contribute to physical effects such as corrections to Coulomb's law? I was under the impression that the renormalized green's functions were strictly physical since they appear in finite results of the theory.
Jan 8, 2019 at 0:41 history edited InertialObserver CC BY-SA 4.0
added 50 characters in body
Jan 8, 2019 at 0:34 comment added InertialObserver In your original question you asked about the observables. And the only observable here is the physical mass, which is defined by making sure there is a pole in the propagator at the physical mass. I should note that there is one more condition I didn't mention, which I will put in my answer.
Jan 8, 2019 at 0:32 history edited InertialObserver CC BY-SA 4.0
added 50 characters in body
Jan 8, 2019 at 0:32 comment added AfterShave Thanks for the reply. How does the one condition nail down the renormalized greens' function seeing as we have multiple free parameters in the renormalization scheme? Am I correct in understanding that the renormalized green's function is supposed to be independent of subtraction schemes across its entire domain? As in literally being the same function for every four-momentum argument?
Jan 8, 2019 at 0:19 history answered InertialObserver CC BY-SA 4.0