Skip to main content

Timeline for Fluid mechanics

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

17 events
when toggle format what by license comment
S Aug 7, 2019 at 16:45 history suggested MarianD CC BY-SA 4.0
Formatting, some fixes.
Aug 7, 2019 at 15:32 review Suggested edits
S Aug 7, 2019 at 16:45
Aug 6, 2019 at 23:55 answer added Ivan Nepomnyashchikh timeline score: 1
Nov 23, 2018 at 13:08 comment added Kshitiz Agarwal @kalle,@Chester miller: I was talking about Lagrangian frame, but the doubt has been resolved in the book they didn't explicitly mentioned that this holds only for steady state flow.
Nov 23, 2018 at 13:01 vote accept Kshitiz Agarwal
Nov 23, 2018 at 12:45 comment added Chet Miller Why do you think that the equation is not valid for steady state flow of a compressible fluid?
Nov 23, 2018 at 9:19 review Suggested edits
Nov 23, 2018 at 10:29
Nov 23, 2018 at 9:04 answer added Deep timeline score: 4
S Nov 23, 2018 at 8:35 history suggested kalle CC BY-SA 4.0
LaTex formatting in equation
Nov 23, 2018 at 8:24 comment added sbp For an in-compressible fluid, the volume in should be equal to the volume out - no sink anywhere; and hence you directly get the equation of continuity.
Nov 23, 2018 at 8:22 comment added sbp @kalle: $v$ is velocity, and $A$ is cross-sectional area.
Nov 23, 2018 at 7:55 comment added kalle Do you know in which reference frame the equation hold? Is it in Eulerian frame, where the volume of a "packet" of fluid is fixed or in Lagrangian frame, where the mass of a packet is fixed, but the volume can vary.
Nov 23, 2018 at 7:53 comment added kalle Could you maybe specify what your variables mean? I assume $\rho$: density, $V$: Volume, $A$ a constant?
Nov 23, 2018 at 7:51 review Suggested edits
S Nov 23, 2018 at 8:35
Nov 23, 2018 at 7:43 history edited Qmechanic CC BY-SA 4.0
edited tags
Nov 23, 2018 at 7:35 review First posts
Nov 23, 2018 at 7:46
Nov 23, 2018 at 7:30 history asked Kshitiz Agarwal CC BY-SA 4.0