Timeline for Divergence of Lienard Wiechert E-Field is not zero? (Violation of Gauss' law)
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2018 at 9:29 | answer | added | Lorenz Mayer | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 13, 2018 at 1:03 | comment | added | Donkey Kong | Thats exactly what I thought! Afterall, this is how the LW field is solved for in the first place. But, is that only for the point $x_0$ where the charge is located? Kind of like the static case ($\nabla \cdot E =0$ except at $x_0$)? Im just kind of confused what to expect! | |
| Oct 12, 2018 at 16:40 | comment | added | Lorenz Mayer | shouldn't it satisfy $\nabla \cdot E = \delta(x-x_0)$, with $x_0$ the location of the source? | |
| Oct 9, 2018 at 9:50 | comment | added | Ján Lalinský | Do you get non-zero divergence even for the case where $\beta'$ is zero all the time (rectilinear motion)? | |
| Oct 9, 2018 at 3:11 | history | asked | Donkey Kong | CC BY-SA 4.0 |