Timeline for Boundary conditions for calculus of variations in phase space and under canonical transformations
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2020 at 13:33 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Minor
|
| Oct 2, 2018 at 5:49 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Minor
|
| Oct 2, 2018 at 2:35 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added explanation
|
| Oct 1, 2018 at 21:48 | vote | accept | dennismoore94 | ||
| Oct 1, 2018 at 21:47 | comment | added | dennismoore94 | Ah, now I see! It is not $\delta Q^i$ (and thus not $\delta p_k$) which must vanish (and which could not happen anyway), but it's "coefficient", leading you to the well-known canonical conditions for the generating function. Thank you, nice answer :) | |
| Oct 1, 2018 at 12:56 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added explanation
|
| Oct 1, 2018 at 12:44 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added explanation
|
| Oct 1, 2018 at 12:31 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added explanation
|
| Sep 30, 2018 at 22:11 | history | answered | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |