Skip to main content
Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackPhysics/status/264033193634713600
layout; retagged;
Source Link
Qmechanic
  • 213.1k
  • 48
  • 590
  • 2.3k

Why can not $\beta$ not be linearly proportional to $T$, that is $\beta = constant \times T$?

$\beta$ inin statistical mechanics is equal to $T$$\frac{1}{k_BT}$ in in thermodynamics, but I do not understand why $\beta=\frac{1}{KT}$ not $\beta=K T$$\beta\propto T^{-1}$ instead of, say, $\beta\propto T$?

Why can not $\beta$ be linearly proportional to $T$, that is $\beta = constant \times T$?

$\beta$ in statistical mechanics is equal to $T$ in in thermodynamics, but I do not understand why $\beta=\frac{1}{KT}$ not $\beta=K T$

Why can $\beta$ not be linearly proportional to $T$, that is $\beta = constant \times T$?

$\beta$ in statistical mechanics is equal to $\frac{1}{k_BT}$ in in thermodynamics, but I do not understand why $\beta\propto T^{-1}$ instead of, say, $\beta\propto T$?

Minor LaTeX improvements for formulas, minor spelling corrections
Source Link

why Why can not β$\beta$ be linearly proportional to T?$T$, that is β$\beta = constant *T\times T$?

β$\beta$ in statistical mechanics is equal to T$T$ in in thermodynamics, but I do not understand why β= 1\KT $\beta=\frac{1}{KT}$ not β = KT$\beta=K T$

why can not β be linearly proportional to T? that is β = constant *T

β in statistical mechanics is equal to T in in thermodynamics, but I do not understand why β= 1\KT not β = KT

Why can not $\beta$ be linearly proportional to $T$, that is $\beta = constant \times T$?

$\beta$ in statistical mechanics is equal to $T$ in in thermodynamics, but I do not understand why $\beta=\frac{1}{KT}$ not $\beta=K T$

Source Link
MEDO
  • 71
  • 2

why can not β be linearly proportional to T? that is β = constant *T

β in statistical mechanics is equal to T in in thermodynamics, but I do not understand why β= 1\KT not β = KT