Skip to main content
Please always provide link for quote
Source Link
Qmechanic
  • 213.1k
  • 48
  • 590
  • 2.3k

No cloning theorem and exclusive or-or (XOR) operator

According to IBM's websiteIBM's website,

where we would [classically] have done an assignment (x=y), we instead initialize the target (x=0) and use exclusive or (x^=y).[...]where we would [classically] have done an assignment (x=y), we instead initialize the target (x=0) and use exclusive or (x^=y).

This sounds like x is a copy (clone) of y, however cloning is impossible in quantum mechanicscloning is impossible in quantum mechanics. What's going on?

No cloning theorem and exclusive or operator

According to IBM's website,

where we would [classically] have done an assignment (x=y), we instead initialize the target (x=0) and use exclusive or (x^=y).

This sounds like x is a copy (clone) of y, however cloning is impossible in quantum mechanics. What's going on?

No cloning theorem and exclusive-or (XOR) operator

According to IBM's website,

[...]where we would [classically] have done an assignment (x=y), we instead initialize the target (x=0) and use exclusive or (x^=y).

This sounds like x is a copy (clone) of y, however cloning is impossible in quantum mechanics. What's going on?

Source Link
Kevin Kostlan
  • 6.7k
  • 1
  • 25
  • 36

No cloning theorem and exclusive or operator

According to IBM's website,

where we would [classically] have done an assignment (x=y), we instead initialize the target (x=0) and use exclusive or (x^=y).

This sounds like x is a copy (clone) of y, however cloning is impossible in quantum mechanics. What's going on?