Timeline for How can 0-dimensional particles or 1-dimensional strings be 3D matter?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2018 at 10:25 | comment | added | BenRW | @daksh No, it is not necessary, for the reasons which I listed. | |
| Sep 28, 2018 at 18:30 | comment | added | weegee | Then Let all the observations go aside and think simply that if we add trillions of particles with 0 thickens then will the sum thickness be more than 0? To obtain a particles in 3-D something has to be there with thickness right? no matter how small we can zoom @BenRW | |
| Sep 28, 2018 at 18:23 | comment | added | weegee | All i'm trying to say is that particles or matter cannot exists with 0 thickness. You are saying that the observations are negligible which i think is irrelevant here because we just "need Observations here" to prove | |
| Sep 28, 2018 at 18:21 | comment | added | BenRW | @daksh Quarks, protons and electrons are all 'particles'. Please rephrase. | |
| Sep 28, 2018 at 18:19 | comment | added | weegee | No i'm talking about "particles" | |
| Sep 28, 2018 at 18:19 | comment | added | BenRW | @daksh I think you're mixing up electrons and protons. Quarks and electrons are both point-like, protons are made of multiple quarks and have spacial extent. | |
| Sep 28, 2018 at 18:16 | comment | added | weegee | "An electron is an elementary particle whose observed size is small enough that if it was exactly zero there would be no difference in our observations." and then we discovered quarks which were smaller. | |
| Sep 28, 2018 at 18:12 | history | answered | BenRW | CC BY-SA 4.0 |