Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 12, 2019 at 9:17 comment added ManRow Yup, c/l gives a frequency of about 1.85e+43 Hz with about 1.23e+9 J per photon! Quite a lot of energy there ; )
Sep 1, 2017 at 22:54 comment added user168013 I'm sure that if that's the bound, then it must be unreachable as asymptote. So, we'd need infinite energy to make such a photon.
Apr 8, 2015 at 9:00 comment added thang How do you get 6.2e34 hz? It's c/l, not 1/l.
Sep 5, 2013 at 1:50 comment added user4552 @lurscher: It's not a paradox, because the answer doesn't assume string theory is correct.
S Oct 30, 2012 at 18:27 history suggested m0nhawk CC BY-SA 3.0
added latex
Oct 30, 2012 at 18:17 review Suggested edits
S Oct 30, 2012 at 18:27
Oct 30, 2012 at 17:46 comment added David Z The Planck length isn't actually the smallest meaningful unit of distance - that's a widely held misconception. But it is theorized that there is some size below which any object collapses to a black hole, and that size is probably on the order of the Planck length.
Oct 30, 2012 at 17:43 comment added lurscher well, but there you got a nice paradox: since string theory assumes that lorentz covariance is a perfect symmetry of the world, a single photon could have any energy, even greater than Planck energy. You need at least two photons to have a rest frame where a plancking black hole will form
Oct 30, 2012 at 17:36 history migrated from electronics.stackexchange.com (revisions)
Oct 30, 2012 at 16:38 comment added Dave Tweed I think you dropped a factor of c somewhere in your calculation.
Oct 30, 2012 at 16:13 history answered Stephen Collings CC BY-SA 3.0