Timeline for How is a superconductor maintaining a persistent current a reversible process?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Dec 17, 2019 at 0:00 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Dec 17, 2019 at 0:00 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| Dec 13, 2019 at 3:29 | comment | added | knzhou | If you added a bounty, you should specify what's insufficient about the existing answer -- it seems to completely answer the question to me. | |
| Dec 11, 2019 at 1:45 | comment | added | psitae | I don't understand what process you a referring to. The act of cooling down a superconducting ring is not reversible (there's heat transfer). If you just talking about the resulting state, well, that's not a process either, it's a state. | |
| Dec 10, 2019 at 21:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/1204506204497690624 | ||
| Dec 9, 2019 at 20:52 | comment | added | Bob D | @KalleMP Aren't the electrons perpetually moving? | |
| S Dec 8, 2019 at 22:52 | history | bounty started | Solidification | ||
| S Dec 8, 2019 at 22:52 | history | notice added | Solidification | Draw attention | |
| Sep 19, 2018 at 9:26 | comment | added | KalleMP | There is no violation as you are not removing any stored energy while it is just sitting there so there is no perpetual motion against friction which would violate the laws. | |
| Sep 19, 2018 at 6:57 | answer | added | A Nejati | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 19, 2018 at 5:35 | history | asked | Solidification | CC BY-SA 4.0 |