Timeline for Utility of the Magnus expansion (preserving symplectic form?)
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2022 at 15:47 | comment | added | Quillo | Related: physics.stackexchange.com/q/736194/226902. Example of use of Magnus expansion: physics.stackexchange.com/a/118877/226902 | |
| Nov 11, 2022 at 6:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/1590947450688532480 | ||
| Jun 25, 2020 at 14:15 | comment | added | Rococo | I think the OP has it backward in that the Dyson expansion is not unitary when truncated to finite order, while the Magnus expansion always is. See for example: personales.upv.es/serblaza/2010EJP.pdf | |
| Jun 25, 2020 at 13:30 | history | edited | QuantumEyedea | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 21 characters in body
|
| Sep 18, 2018 at 17:57 | comment | added | Sunyam | Isn't the expansion you wrote down is Dyson expansion in contrast to magnus expansion which should be something else. | |
| Sep 18, 2018 at 17:56 | comment | added | Qmechanic♦ | $\uparrow$ Heard where? | |
| Sep 18, 2018 at 17:05 | history | asked | QuantumEyedea | CC BY-SA 4.0 |