Timeline for Non-standing waves on string
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2021 at 12:09 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Nov 15, 2020 at 4:04 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jul 18, 2020 at 2:05 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Aug 4, 2018 at 10:47 | history | edited | Nat | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 254 characters in body
|
| Aug 4, 2018 at 10:20 | answer | added | Farcher | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 31, 2018 at 20:44 | comment | added | probably_someone | If your source is vibrating one end of the string, then that end is no longer fixed, and the normal standing-wave conditions (which assume two fixed ends) don't apply. | |
| Jul 31, 2018 at 20:13 | comment | added | Philip Wood | But have you considered what happens to the reflected wave when it reaches the 'source end' of the string, and so on? There will be interference between an infinite number of waves. It's not that hard to handle it mathematically, but easier if you lose a small fraction of the amplitude on each reflection. | |
| Jul 31, 2018 at 20:05 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited tags; edited title
|
| Jul 31, 2018 at 19:10 | review | First posts | |||
| Jul 31, 2018 at 19:39 | |||||
| Jul 31, 2018 at 19:07 | history | asked | Csaba | CC BY-SA 4.0 |