Timeline for Particle in electromagnetic field Lagrangian
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 28, 2018 at 13:56 | comment | added | Mathphys meister | The only thing you can do is show that the Lagrangian gives the desired force that you claimed, then the Lagrangian describes the system. This is a derivation done in e.g. Goldstein. | |
Aug 28, 2018 at 13:55 | comment | added | Mathphys meister | I am sorry I thought that i found a way of deriving it but I do not know how to show it without this guess! For the moment just to try to accept it, I hope somebody can help you out! | |
Aug 28, 2018 at 12:31 | comment | added | Tamir Vered | @dani Well that's disappointing... | |
Aug 26, 2018 at 14:02 | comment | added | Mathphys meister | I am afraid that the only answer I can give is that it is indeed an educated guess... It just seems to be consistent with the previous results | |
Jul 30, 2018 at 14:02 | comment | added | Tamir Vered | @cobra121 I'm aware of that but it bugs me to think that this Lagrangian is just an "educated guess" that just in case gives us the correct force... That's why I want to see a derivation. | |
Jul 30, 2018 at 12:46 | comment | added | cobra121 | The potential in a lagrangian is supposed to give us the forces. If any force is velocity dependent, the potential would need to be modified so as to produce the force in the equations. | |
Jul 30, 2018 at 10:52 | comment | added | Qmechanic♦ | This is e.g. derived in Goldstein, Section 1.5. | |
Jul 30, 2018 at 10:51 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 11 characters in body; edited tags
|
Jul 30, 2018 at 10:33 | history | edited | Tamir Vered | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 9 characters in body
|
Jul 30, 2018 at 9:56 | history | edited | Tamir Vered | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 26 characters in body
|
Jul 30, 2018 at 9:55 | review | First posts | |||
Jul 30, 2018 at 11:36 | |||||
Jul 30, 2018 at 9:51 | history | asked | Tamir Vered | CC BY-SA 4.0 |