Timeline for Classical limit of quantum mechanics
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2019 at 2:49 | comment | added | David Spector | So, is the answer 'yes' or 'no'? Can Planck's constant be considered a variable in the limit to zero or does this fail? Lots of people seem to believe that it works, and can generate any representation of classical mechanics. | |
| Oct 30, 2012 at 12:05 | comment | added | Qmechanic♦ | In such cases, it is often better to just flag/comment about duplicate questions, so they can get closed. | |
| Oct 30, 2012 at 11:38 | comment | added | juanrga | Edited, although the policy only states "that you should disclose personal connections whenever you reference something you're involved with" and the nick makes the connection rather evident. Regarding nearly identical questions, it is waited that the answers will be very similar and the material cited reply both questions. How to answer in such case? | |
| Oct 30, 2012 at 11:27 | history | edited | juanrga | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 12 characters in body
|
| Oct 29, 2012 at 21:41 | comment | added | Qmechanic♦ | Dear @juanrga, for your information, Physics.SE has a policy that it is OK to cite oneself, but it should be stated clearly and explicitly in the answer itself, not in attached links. Also it is frown upon to post nearly identical answers to similar posts. | |
| Oct 29, 2012 at 20:55 | history | edited | juanrga | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 41 characters in body; added 160 characters in body
|
| Oct 29, 2012 at 20:45 | history | answered | juanrga | CC BY-SA 3.0 |