Timeline for If $2p$ is circular, why is $2p_x$ not circular and what does $x$ mean?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 10, 2018 at 18:13 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ |
edited tags
|
|
S Jul 10, 2018 at 15:19 | history | suggested | CAF | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added latex
|
Jul 10, 2018 at 14:21 | answer | added | Panos C. | timeline score: 1 | |
Jul 10, 2018 at 14:21 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Jul 10, 2018 at 15:19 | |||||
Jul 10, 2018 at 14:14 | answer | added | Satwata Hans | timeline score: 3 | |
Jul 10, 2018 at 13:24 | comment | added | StephenG - Help Ukraine | Bohr's model, despite it's historic significance, is not valid and honestly I wish they'd stop teaching it as people have to unlearn the darn thing to learn quantum models, even at the level of an overview. It's the source of lots of confusion. | |
Jul 10, 2018 at 13:22 | comment | added | Jon Custer | Orbitals such as $2s$ or $2p$ are beyond the Bohr model. They are actual solutions to the single-electron Schrodinger equation... | |
Jul 10, 2018 at 12:00 | history | asked | Theoretical | CC BY-SA 4.0 |