Timeline for Is there a rule on which order to write derived SI units?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 8, 2022 at 7:09 | history | edited | Urb | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body; edited tags
|
Jun 10, 2018 at 7:37 | comment | added | Ng Chung Tak | For your interest, the SI units are usually referred as MKS systems (i.e. metre-kilogram-second); whereas Gaussian units as CGS systems (i.e. centimetre-gram-second). | |
Jun 9, 2018 at 17:06 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/1005496482500358144 | ||
Jun 9, 2018 at 14:45 | comment | added | nowox | @BenCrowell, this is well seen. | |
Jun 9, 2018 at 14:43 | comment | added | user4552 | People normally write the units of work as $\text{N}\cdot\text{m}$ rather than $\text{m}\cdot\text{N}$. I've always assumed this was to keep it from looking like millinewtons. Cf. foot-pounds. | |
Jun 9, 2018 at 14:35 | answer | added | Jasper | timeline score: 1 | |
Jun 9, 2018 at 14:33 | comment | added | nowox | @Jasper, Well, I am blind then :( | |
Jun 9, 2018 at 14:31 | comment | added | Kyle Kanos | I've never noted any required ordering in my career, though it is usual to put denominators last. | |
Jun 9, 2018 at 14:30 | comment | added | Jasper | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… | |
Jun 9, 2018 at 14:07 | history | asked | nowox | CC BY-SA 4.0 |