Timeline for Issue with calculating free fermionic propagator from partition function
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 19, 2018 at 23:17 | comment | added | Arturo don Juan | @AccidentalFourierTransform I figured it out. You're right, and the suspicion I had in my last comment was right. In the explicit generating functional, we should have $G(x,y)=\Delta^{-1}$, which in this case should actually be $(i\not\partial-m+i\epsilon)^{-1}\delta(x-y)$. If you want to write all this (and what you were saying) up into an answer I'd be glad to accept. | |
May 19, 2018 at 22:56 | comment | added | Arturo don Juan | Hmm that's interesting. Do you mean then that the closed-form generating functional (eq.14.102) should have a similar $\delta$-function also (which would enable you to collapse one of the integrals)? | |
May 19, 2018 at 21:41 | comment | added | AccidentalFourierTransform | Sorry, I didn't read things carefully before. The main problem is that what you mean by $(\not\partial+m+i\epsilon)^{-1}$ is different from what Schwartz means by that expression. In particular, what you denote by $(\not\partial+m+i\epsilon)^{-1}$ is the same thing Schwartz denotes by $(\not\partial+m+i\epsilon)^{-1}\delta$. More generally, people sometimes leave $\delta$'s implicit, and sometimes they don't. And the conventions are not completely uniform. See also physics.stackexchange.com/q/329123/84967 | |
May 19, 2018 at 20:32 | comment | added | Arturo don Juan | @AccidentalFourierTransform That's what I'm confused about. In eq.4. you can see that the $\bar{\eta}$ is sitting inside an integral, so if I take the functional derivative of that I shouldn't get a $\delta$-function. This is all in reference to the definitions I made in equations (1) and (2), which I assume are correct. | |
May 19, 2018 at 20:29 | comment | added | AccidentalFourierTransform | You missed it after eq.4. | |
May 19, 2018 at 20:27 | comment | added | Arturo don Juan | @AccidentalFourierTransform What about the $\delta$-function? | |
May 19, 2018 at 20:23 | comment | added | AccidentalFourierTransform | Your answer and the author's answer are identical (perhaps, up to a sign; I didn't check). | |
May 19, 2018 at 20:19 | history | edited | Arturo don Juan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 427 characters in body
|
May 19, 2018 at 20:02 | history | asked | Arturo don Juan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |