Timeline for Are there SUSY Lagrangian terms that are not D-term nor F-term?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2018 at 14:26 | comment | added | Nogueira | For change a chiral term $W$ into a F-term just solve the equation $\bar{D}^2 V= W$. An integral in the full superspace of $V$ gives the chiral integral of $W$. | |
| Oct 5, 2018 at 14:22 | history | edited | Nogueira | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 127 characters in body
|
| Oct 5, 2018 at 14:18 | comment | added | Nogueira | For d=4 N=1 supersymmetry, the answer is no. All invariants in d=4 N=1 can be written as integrals over the whole superspace (F-term). | |
| Oct 4, 2018 at 10:01 | comment | added | Annibale | Thank you for your answer, but my doubt was (with reference to your example) if I can construct a chiral superfield whose F component is the same $\rangle \psi Q\psi\langle$, and so also that is, not manifestly, an F-term. More clearly my question is are there any susy-invariant lagrangian that couldn't bring back to the F-term of some chiral superfield? | |
| May 2, 2018 at 2:55 | history | edited | Nogueira | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 375 characters in body
|
| May 2, 2018 at 2:33 | history | answered | Nogueira | CC BY-SA 4.0 |