Skip to main content
Rollback to Revision 3
Source Link
user346
user346

LQG formulations have a minimum length/area. Since say, a Planck area can always be boosted, any minimum area in space can be shrunk. Do LQG proponents worry about local Lorentz invariance violation, and if not, why not? In LQG, does considering length to be a quantum operator really get rid of the boost problem?

If LQG turns out to be Lorentz covariant, what is the explicit form of the Lorentz boost generator operator, and can it be explicitly shown to be a symmetry of the theory?

LQG formulations have a minimum length/area. Since say, a Planck area can always be boosted, any minimum area in space can be shrunk. Do LQG proponents worry about local Lorentz invariance violation, and if not, why not? In LQG, does considering length to be a quantum operator really get rid of the boost problem?

If LQG turns out to be Lorentz covariant, what is the explicit form of the Lorentz boost generator operator, and can it be explicitly shown to be a symmetry of the theory?

LQG formulations have a minimum length/area. Since say, a Planck area can always be boosted, any minimum area in space can be shrunk. Do LQG proponents worry about local Lorentz invariance violation, and if not, why not? In LQG, does considering length to be a quantum operator really get rid of the boost problem?

LQG formulations have a minimum length/area. Since say, a Planck area can always be boosted, any minimum area in space can be shrunk. Do LQG proponents worry about local Lorentz invariance violation, and if not, why not? In LQG, does considering length to be a quantum operator really get rid of the boost problem?

If LQG turns out to be Lorentz covariant, what is the explicit form of the Lorentz boost generator operator, and can it be explicitly shown to be a symmetry of the theory?

LQG formulations have a minimum length/area. Since say, a Planck area can always be boosted, any minimum area in space can be shrunk. Do LQG proponents worry about local Lorentz invariance violation, and if not, why not? In LQG, does considering length to be a quantum operator really get rid of the boost problem?

LQG formulations have a minimum length/area. Since say, a Planck area can always be boosted, any minimum area in space can be shrunk. Do LQG proponents worry about local Lorentz invariance violation, and if not, why not? In LQG, does considering length to be a quantum operator really get rid of the boost problem?

If LQG turns out to be Lorentz covariant, what is the explicit form of the Lorentz boost generator operator, and can it be explicitly shown to be a symmetry of the theory?

edited tags
Link
user566
user566
added 6 characters in body
Source Link
Gordon
  • 4.4k
  • 1
  • 30
  • 36
Loading
Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackPhysics/status/30856645114339328
Source Link
Gordon
  • 4.4k
  • 1
  • 30
  • 36
Loading