Skip to main content
make the equation clearer using \frac
Source Link

enter image description here

For this problem, the solution is: $$y=\frac{m}{qE}\gamma[\text{cosh}(\frac{qEx}{mv\gamma})-1]$$$$y=\frac{m}{qE}\gamma\left[\cosh\left(\frac{qEx}{mv\gamma}\right)-1\right]$$ where $\gamma = 1/\sqrt(1-v^2)$$\gamma = 1/\sqrt{1-v^2}$. Here something seems to be wrong. I think that for the nonrelativisticnon-relativistic limit where $v$ is very small in magnitude, the trajectory of $y$ must be a parabola. However, this kind of behavior happens when $v$ is close to $1$, when $1/(v\gamma)$ becomes small, so the taylor expansion works for some range of $x$. How should I account for this phenomenon? In Newtonian mechanics, it seems clear that the trajectory of $y$ is a parabola.

enter image description here

For this problem, the solution is: $$y=\frac{m}{qE}\gamma[\text{cosh}(\frac{qEx}{mv\gamma})-1]$$ where $\gamma = 1/\sqrt(1-v^2)$. Here something seems to be wrong. I think that for the nonrelativistic limit where $v$ is very small in magnitude, the trajectory of $y$ must be a parabola. However, this kind of behavior happens when $v$ is close to $1$, when $1/(v\gamma)$ becomes small, so the taylor expansion works for some range of $x$. How should I account for this phenomenon? In Newtonian mechanics, it seems clear that the trajectory of $y$ is a parabola.

enter image description here

For this problem, the solution is: $$y=\frac{m}{qE}\gamma\left[\cosh\left(\frac{qEx}{mv\gamma}\right)-1\right]$$ where $\gamma = 1/\sqrt{1-v^2}$. Here something seems to be wrong. I think that for the non-relativistic limit where $v$ is very small in magnitude, the trajectory of $y$ must be a parabola. However, this kind of behavior happens when $v$ is close to $1$, when $1/(v\gamma)$ becomes small, so the taylor expansion works for some range of $x$. How should I account for this phenomenon? In Newtonian mechanics, it seems clear that the trajectory of $y$ is a parabola.

enter image description here

For this problem, the solution is: $$y=(m/qE)\gamma[\text{cosh}(qEx/(mv\gamma))-1]$$$$y=\frac{m}{qE}\gamma[\text{cosh}(\frac{qEx}{mv\gamma})-1]$$ where $\gamma = 1/\sqrt(1-v^2)$. Here something seems to be wrong. I think that for the nonrelativistic limit where $v$ is very small in magnitude, the trajectory of $y$ must be a parabola. However, this kind of behavior happens when $v$ is close to $1$, when $1/(v\gamma)$ becomes small, so the taylor expansion works for some range of $x$. How should I account for this phenomenon? In Newtonian mechanics, it seems clear that the trajectory of $y$ is a parabola.

enter image description here

For this problem, the solution is: $$y=(m/qE)\gamma[\text{cosh}(qEx/(mv\gamma))-1]$$ where $\gamma = 1/\sqrt(1-v^2)$. Here something seems to be wrong. I think that for the nonrelativistic limit where $v$ is very small in magnitude, the trajectory of $y$ must be a parabola. However, this kind of behavior happens when $v$ is close to $1$, when $1/(v\gamma)$ becomes small, so the taylor expansion works for some range of $x$. How should I account for this phenomenon? In Newtonian mechanics, it seems clear that the trajectory of $y$ is a parabola.

enter image description here

For this problem, the solution is: $$y=\frac{m}{qE}\gamma[\text{cosh}(\frac{qEx}{mv\gamma})-1]$$ where $\gamma = 1/\sqrt(1-v^2)$. Here something seems to be wrong. I think that for the nonrelativistic limit where $v$ is very small in magnitude, the trajectory of $y$ must be a parabola. However, this kind of behavior happens when $v$ is close to $1$, when $1/(v\gamma)$ becomes small, so the taylor expansion works for some range of $x$. How should I account for this phenomenon? In Newtonian mechanics, it seems clear that the trajectory of $y$ is a parabola.

improved formatting for equation.
Source Link
cms
  • 4k
  • 2
  • 12
  • 24

enter image description here

For this problem, the solution is $y=(m/qE)\gamma[\text{cosh}(qEx/(mv\gamma))-1]$ where: $$y=(m/qE)\gamma[\text{cosh}(qEx/(mv\gamma))-1]$$ where $\gamma = 1/\sqrt(1-v^2)$. Here something seems to be wrong. I think that for the nonrelativistic limit where $v$ is very small in magnitude, the trajectory of $y$ must be a parabola. However, this kind of behavior happens when $v$ is close to $1$, when $1/(v\gamma)$ becomes small, so the taylor expansion works for some range of $x$. How should I account for this phenomenon? In Newtonian mechanics, it seems clear that the trajectory of $y$ is a parabola.

enter image description here

For this problem, the solution is $y=(m/qE)\gamma[\text{cosh}(qEx/(mv\gamma))-1]$ where $\gamma = 1/\sqrt(1-v^2)$. Here something seems to be wrong. I think that for the nonrelativistic limit where $v$ is very small in magnitude, the trajectory of $y$ must be a parabola. However, this kind of behavior happens when $v$ is close to $1$, when $1/(v\gamma)$ becomes small, so the taylor expansion works for some range of $x$. How should I account for this phenomenon? In Newtonian mechanics, it seems clear that the trajectory of $y$ is a parabola.

enter image description here

For this problem, the solution is: $$y=(m/qE)\gamma[\text{cosh}(qEx/(mv\gamma))-1]$$ where $\gamma = 1/\sqrt(1-v^2)$. Here something seems to be wrong. I think that for the nonrelativistic limit where $v$ is very small in magnitude, the trajectory of $y$ must be a parabola. However, this kind of behavior happens when $v$ is close to $1$, when $1/(v\gamma)$ becomes small, so the taylor expansion works for some range of $x$. How should I account for this phenomenon? In Newtonian mechanics, it seems clear that the trajectory of $y$ is a parabola.

deleted 2 characters in body; edited tags
Source Link
Qmechanic
  • 213.1k
  • 48
  • 590
  • 2.3k
Loading
Source Link
Keith
  • 1.7k
  • 1
  • 11
  • 18
Loading