Timeline for On Groenewold's Theorem and Classical and Quantum Hamiltonians
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2020 at 17:47 | history | edited | Jake Xuereb | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
spelling mistake
|
| Mar 6, 2018 at 7:29 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/970924293747077120 | ||
| Mar 5, 2018 at 8:21 | vote | accept | Jake Xuereb | ||
| Mar 5, 2018 at 2:44 | answer | added | Cosmas Zachos | timeline score: 31 | |
| Mar 5, 2018 at 1:41 | comment | added | Cosmas Zachos | Related. | |
| Mar 3, 2018 at 22:12 | history | edited | Jake Xuereb | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 179 characters in body
|
| Mar 3, 2018 at 22:11 | comment | added | Qmechanic♦ | Related question by OP: physics.stackexchange.com/q/386828/2451 | |
| Mar 3, 2018 at 22:07 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 65 characters in body
|
| Mar 3, 2018 at 22:03 | comment | added | Jake Xuereb | Given that both have a classical starting point, hamiltonians that wouldn't fit either, purely quantum mechanically derrived hamiltonians | |
| Mar 3, 2018 at 22:01 | comment | added | probably_someone | Not derivable using canonical quantization, or not derivable using Moyal quantization? | |
| Mar 3, 2018 at 22:01 | comment | added | Jake Xuereb | Isn't Moyal Quantization based off of creating a bijection between classical and quantum observables ? I want to find hamiltonians which have no classical analogues which from my point of view would not be derrivable using such a process | |
| Mar 3, 2018 at 21:52 | comment | added | probably_someone | Quantization still works, you just need to use Moyal brackets instead of Poisson brackets. | |
| Mar 3, 2018 at 21:34 | history | asked | Jake Xuereb | CC BY-SA 3.0 |