Timeline for Why is $\frac{d}{dt} \langle \psi | = (\frac{d}{dt} | \psi \rangle )^{\dagger} $?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 21, 2018 at 17:55 | history | edited | J. Murray | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 71 characters in body
|
S Feb 20, 2018 at 20:58 | history | suggested | secavara | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
corrected a typo
|
Feb 20, 2018 at 20:42 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Feb 20, 2018 at 20:58 | |||||
Feb 20, 2018 at 20:35 | comment | added | J. Murray | @StarBucK I've added to my answer to justify the exchange of the limit and the adjoint operation. | |
Feb 20, 2018 at 20:34 | history | edited | J. Murray | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added section RE OP's comments
|
Feb 20, 2018 at 20:14 | comment | added | J. Murray | That's a reasonable question, and the answer depends on how deeply you want to go. The operator norm of some operator $A$ is equal to the operator norm of $A^\dagger$ - you can use this fact to demonstrate that if you have a sequence of operators $\{a_n\}$ which converges to $A$, then the sequence $\{a_n^\dagger\}$ converges to $A^\dagger$, and take the limit that way. | |
Feb 20, 2018 at 20:12 | history | edited | J. Murray | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 15 characters in body
|
Feb 20, 2018 at 19:55 | comment | added | anon | I tried to do this but here you use the fact you can intervet the limit and the dagger. How do we know we can do this ? | |
Feb 20, 2018 at 19:31 | history | undeleted | J. Murray | ||
Feb 20, 2018 at 19:31 | history | deleted | J. Murray | via Vote | |
Feb 20, 2018 at 19:30 | history | answered | J. Murray | CC BY-SA 3.0 |