Timeline for Definition of granular material
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2019 at 9:46 | vote | accept | fahd | ||
| Jan 11, 2019 at 9:46 | vote | accept | fahd | ||
| Jan 11, 2019 at 9:46 | |||||
| Dec 5, 2018 at 16:54 | answer | added | rkoz | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 16, 2018 at 3:15 | answer | added | pentane | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 16, 2018 at 3:10 | history | edited | pentane | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
grammar
|
| Jan 16, 2018 at 3:05 | history | edited | pentane | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
grammar
|
| Jan 13, 2018 at 20:18 | comment | added | Chemomechanics | You could tell them that the system size criterion is subjective. If you don't have the computational power to model the stresses, orientation, and displacement of each particle, then you need the constitutive equations for a granular material. | |
| Jan 13, 2018 at 4:57 | comment | added | fahd | Thanks...it is clear Then it is significant ony when large number is present.isn't it?.then is it necessary to specify how much large number.can we define an accurate boundary. I think it is not needed,but people often ask for clarification. What should i say them? | |
| Jan 11, 2018 at 19:08 | comment | added | Chemomechanics | I would think a granular material is one containing particles too large to satisfy the continuum assumption and too small (i.e., too numerous) to be worth characterizing individually when analyzing the system through constitutive equations. | |
| Jan 11, 2018 at 12:02 | history | asked | fahd | CC BY-SA 3.0 |