Skip to main content
Extended a bit the answer (included bifurcations).
Source Link
stafusa
  • 12.7k
  • 13
  • 34
  • 66

There are two main mechanisms for that inIn the context of dynamical systems, there are at least three main mechanisms that can lead to sudden changes:

  • chaotic dynamics;chaos;
  • multistabilitymultistability;
  • bifurcation.

In the first case, chaos, your $S_X$ diverges trivially, from the definition itself $-$ in the chaotic regime nearby trajectories in phase space diverge exponentially. That's probably the explanation most closely related to the weather "instability". The prototypical scheme of two trajectories diverging exponentially ($\lambda$ is the Lyapunov exponent) in phase space is:

Source: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Orbital_instability_(Lyapunov_exponent).png

where $\lambda$ is the Lyapunov exponent.

Multistability means that more then one outcome is allowed by the dynamics, with the system's initial condition determining which one is eventually attained. The region in phase space whose points evolve to a given attractor is called its basin of attraction. In the double well potential, for instance, each of the two local minima is an attractor in the presence of dissipation, with their basins of attraction looking something like:

Source: http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/File:Fig1.gif

This situation can lead to sudden changes when the system finds itself close to the boundary between two basins of attraction. And when the basin of the desired outcome is relatively small, it's hard not to be close to the boundary. Not falling, in the rock climbing example, could be seen as the desired basin, and it's a rather small one, given the typical safety margins of a few millimeters or less.

In a bifurcation, the system experiences a qualitative change in behavior with the variation of a parameter. In some sense it's then not exactly the same system as before. For example, if in a $1$-D system, the point $0$ is an attractor for negative values of its parameter $r$, but a repellor for $r>0$ (where two other attractors arise), the system undergoes a bifurcation at $r=0$ and its bifurcation diagram (attractors and repellors as a function of a parameter) can look like:

Source: https://math.stackexchange.com/a/495005/418568

Thus, in a system close to a bifurcation, a small change in the parameter can lead to a sudden global change. In the weather, or rather climate example, that could correspond to, say, an ice age being precipitated by a small change in the concentration of a gas in the atmosphere or a small change in Earth's orbit.

There are two main mechanisms for that in the context of dynamical systems:

  • chaotic dynamics;
  • multistability.

In the first case, chaos, your $S_X$ diverges trivially, from the definition itself $-$ in the chaotic regime nearby trajectories in phase space diverge exponentially. That's probably the explanation most closely related to the weather "instability". The prototypical scheme of two trajectories diverging exponentially ($\lambda$ is the Lyapunov exponent) in phase space is:

Source: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Orbital_instability_(Lyapunov_exponent).png

Multistability means that more then one outcome is allowed by the dynamics, with the system's initial condition determining which one is eventually attained. The region in phase space whose points evolve to a given attractor is called its basin of attraction. In the double well potential, for instance, each of the two local minima is an attractor in the presence of dissipation, with their basins of attraction looking something like:

Source: http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/File:Fig1.gif

This situation can lead to sudden changes when the system finds itself close to the boundary between two basins of attraction. And when the basin of the desired outcome is relatively small, it's hard not to be close to the boundary. Not falling, in the rock climbing example, could be seen as the desired basin, and it's a rather small one, given the typical safety margins of a few millimeters or less.

In the context of dynamical systems, there are at least three main mechanisms that can lead to sudden changes:

  • chaos;
  • multistability;
  • bifurcation.

In the first case, chaos, your $S_X$ diverges trivially, from the definition itself $-$ in the chaotic regime nearby trajectories in phase space diverge exponentially. That's probably the explanation most closely related to the weather "instability". The prototypical scheme of two trajectories diverging exponentially in phase space is:

Source: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Orbital_instability_(Lyapunov_exponent).png

where $\lambda$ is the Lyapunov exponent.

Multistability means that more then one outcome is allowed by the dynamics, with the system's initial condition determining which one is eventually attained. The region in phase space whose points evolve to a given attractor is called its basin of attraction. In the double well potential, for instance, each of the two local minima is an attractor in the presence of dissipation, with their basins of attraction looking something like:

Source: http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/File:Fig1.gif

This situation can lead to sudden changes when the system finds itself close to the boundary between two basins of attraction. And when the basin of the desired outcome is relatively small, it's hard not to be close to the boundary. Not falling, in the rock climbing example, could be seen as the desired basin, and it's a rather small one, given the typical safety margins of a few millimeters or less.

In a bifurcation, the system experiences a qualitative change in behavior with the variation of a parameter. In some sense it's then not exactly the same system as before. For example, if in a $1$-D system, the point $0$ is an attractor for negative values of its parameter $r$, but a repellor for $r>0$ (where two other attractors arise), the system undergoes a bifurcation at $r=0$ and its bifurcation diagram (attractors and repellors as a function of a parameter) can look like:

Source: https://math.stackexchange.com/a/495005/418568

Thus, in a system close to a bifurcation, a small change in the parameter can lead to a sudden global change. In the weather, or rather climate example, that could correspond to, say, an ice age being precipitated by a small change in the concentration of a gas in the atmosphere or a small change in Earth's orbit.

A few improvements (mostly figures).
Source Link
stafusa
  • 12.7k
  • 13
  • 34
  • 66

There are two main mechanisms for that in the context of dynamical systems:

  • chaotic dynamics; and
  • multistability.

In the first case, chaoschaos, your $S_X$ diverges trivially, from the definition itself $-$ in the chaotic regime nearby trajectories in phase space diverge exponentially. That's probably the explanation most closely related to the weather "instability". The prototypical scheme of two trajectories diverging exponentially ($\lambda$ is the Lyapunov exponent) in phase space is:

MultistabilitySource: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Orbital_instability_(Lyapunov_exponent).png

Multistability means that more then one outcome is allowed by the dynamics, and it'swith the system's initial condition that determinesdetermining which one is eventually attained. The region in phase space whose points evolve to a given attractor is called its basin of attraction. In the double well potential, for instance, each of the two local minima is an attractor in the presence of dissipation, with their basins of attraction looking something like:

Source: http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/File:Fig1.gif

This situation can lead to sudden changes when the system finds itself close to the boundary between regions in phase space that lead to different outcomestwo basins of attraction. And when the region in phase space leading tobasin of the desired outcome is relatively small, it's hard not to be close to the boundary. Not falling, in the rock climbing example is, could be seen as the desired region in phase spacebasin, and it's a rather small $-$ one typically has a, given the typical safety marginmargins of a few millimeters or less.

There are two main mechanisms:

  • chaotic dynamics; and
  • multistability.

In the first case, chaos, your $S_X$ diverges trivially, from the definition itself $-$ in the chaotic regime nearby trajectories in phase space diverge exponentially. That's probably the explanation most closely related to the weather "instability".

Multistability means that more then one outcome is allowed by the dynamics, and it's the initial condition that determines which one is eventually attained. This situation can lead to sudden changes when the system finds itself close to the boundary between regions in phase space that lead to different outcomes. And when the region in phase space leading to the desired outcome is relatively small, it's hard not to be close to the boundary. Not falling, in the rock climbing example is the desired region in phase space, and it's rather small $-$ one typically has a safety margin of a few millimeters or less.

There are two main mechanisms for that in the context of dynamical systems:

  • chaotic dynamics;
  • multistability.

In the first case, chaos, your $S_X$ diverges trivially, from the definition itself $-$ in the chaotic regime nearby trajectories in phase space diverge exponentially. That's probably the explanation most closely related to the weather "instability". The prototypical scheme of two trajectories diverging exponentially ($\lambda$ is the Lyapunov exponent) in phase space is:

Source: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Orbital_instability_(Lyapunov_exponent).png

Multistability means that more then one outcome is allowed by the dynamics, with the system's initial condition determining which one is eventually attained. The region in phase space whose points evolve to a given attractor is called its basin of attraction. In the double well potential, for instance, each of the two local minima is an attractor in the presence of dissipation, with their basins of attraction looking something like:

Source: http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/File:Fig1.gif

This situation can lead to sudden changes when the system finds itself close to the boundary between two basins of attraction. And when the basin of the desired outcome is relatively small, it's hard not to be close to the boundary. Not falling, in the rock climbing example, could be seen as the desired basin, and it's a rather small one, given the typical safety margins of a few millimeters or less.

Source Link
stafusa
  • 12.7k
  • 13
  • 34
  • 66

There are two main mechanisms:

  • chaotic dynamics; and
  • multistability.

In the first case, chaos, your $S_X$ diverges trivially, from the definition itself $-$ in the chaotic regime nearby trajectories in phase space diverge exponentially. That's probably the explanation most closely related to the weather "instability".

Multistability means that more then one outcome is allowed by the dynamics, and it's the initial condition that determines which one is eventually attained. This situation can lead to sudden changes when the system finds itself close to the boundary between regions in phase space that lead to different outcomes. And when the region in phase space leading to the desired outcome is relatively small, it's hard not to be close to the boundary. Not falling, in the rock climbing example is the desired region in phase space, and it's rather small $-$ one typically has a safety margin of a few millimeters or less.