Timeline for (Anti)commutation of ghosts and fermions

8 events

when toggle format	what		by	license	comment
Aug 20 at 13:00	comment	added	Vladimir		Dear @Qmechanic, it will be good to specify what kind of Grassmann algebra is considered. I mean its dimension and topology.
Dec 24, 2017 at 18:49	comment	added	Blazej		I accept this answer, even though the question whether convention with BRS operator taken as graded with respect to the ghost number is acceptable is still open for me. However it is not strictly speaking the question I originally asked, and it might be very dificult to give a definite answer.
Dec 24, 2017 at 18:44	vote	accept	Blazej
Dec 23, 2017 at 21:26	history	edited	Qmechanic♦	CC BY-SA 3.0	Added explanation
Dec 23, 2017 at 20:28	comment	added	Blazej		Dear @Qmechanic , please note that I edited my question to specify where precisely the problem arises and what led me to believing that $[c^a,\psi]=0$ (on the level of integration variables) is the consistent definition in the approach I am using.
Dec 23, 2017 at 18:01	history	edited	Qmechanic♦	CC BY-SA 3.0	Added explanation
Dec 23, 2017 at 17:31	comment	added	Blazej		Dear @Qmechanic mathematically we can have a situation where we have two indepedent Grassmann algebras, generated by $\eta_i$ and $\xi_i$, so that $ \{ \xi_i , \xi_j \} = \{ \eta_i , \eta_j \}=0$ but $[\eta_i, \xi_j]=0$. The question is whether such construction is implemented is quantum field theories.
Dec 23, 2017 at 17:01	history	answered	Qmechanic♦	CC BY-SA 3.0