Timeline for Confusion regarding emf
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 2017 at 3:08 | comment | added | garyp | That's clearer, but now re-reading your original answer, I see that you said pretty much the same thing. I really mis-read it first time around. Thanks. | |
| Dec 23, 2017 at 20:44 | comment | added | Alfred Centauri | @garyp, I added an elaboration to my answer. | |
| Dec 23, 2017 at 20:43 | history | edited | Alfred Centauri | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 766 characters in body
|
| Dec 23, 2017 at 19:45 | comment | added | garyp | Can you elaborate on the last paragraph? There is an electric field associated with the emf, but no total field. So there must be a field canceling the field due to the emf. What is that field? Also, with no total field, there is no force on a test charge, hence no work. | |
| Dec 23, 2017 at 13:08 | history | answered | Alfred Centauri | CC BY-SA 3.0 |