Timeline for Logarithmic decrement in underdamped oscillations
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2017 at 21:00 | history | edited | rob♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added typesetting
|
| Dec 10, 2017 at 16:18 | comment | added | Emilio Pisanty | Note that you can (and should) use LaTeX notation for typesetting mathematics. For a tutorial, see here. | |
| Dec 10, 2017 at 13:32 | review | Low quality answers | |||
| Dec 10, 2017 at 20:57 | |||||
| Dec 10, 2017 at 12:15 | comment | added | sonu | A very common doubt, actually, here it is the ratio of amplitudes separated by half period only and not one. As in the question, we see that in eqn. 2.19 the term bT is divided by 2 in order to account for that. If the ratio were taken in one oscillation, the '2' would not be there. | |
| Dec 10, 2017 at 12:06 | comment | added | Farcher | Is it not the ratio of amplitudes separated by one period of the oscillations rather than half a period? | |
| Dec 10, 2017 at 12:04 | history | edited | sonu | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 34 characters in body
|
| Dec 10, 2017 at 11:19 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 10, 2017 at 11:28 | |||||
| Dec 10, 2017 at 11:17 | history | answered | sonu | CC BY-SA 3.0 |